| 1 |
The US biofuel mandate as a substitute for carbon cap-and-trade
Thompson W, Johansson R, Meyer S, Whistance J
Energy Policy, 113, 368, 2018 |
| 2 |
Feasibility of meeting increased biofuel mandates with E85
Pouliot S, Babcock BA
Energy Policy, 101, 194, 2017 |
| 3 |
No free ride to zero-emissions: Simulating a region's need to implement its own zero-emissions vehicle (ZEV) mandate to achieve 2050 GHG targets
Sykes M, Axsen J
Energy Policy, 110, 447, 2017 |
| 4 |
A model of state and federal biofuel policy: Feasibility assessment of the California Low Carbon Fuel Standard
Christensen A, Hobbs B
Applied Energy, 169, 799, 2016 |
| 5 |
[기획특집: 지속가능한 수송용 바이오연료의 개발] 지속가능한 바이오연료의 보급정책과 기술개발 동향
김재곤
Korean Industrial Chemistry News, 16(2), 1, 2013 |
| 6 |
Mandates, buyouts and fuel-tax rebates: Some economic aspects of biofuel policies using the UK as an example
Swinbank A, Tranter R, Jones P
Energy Policy, 39(3), 1249, 2011 |
| 7 |
The US biodiesel use mandate and biodiesel feedstock markets
Thompson W, Meyer S, Green T
Biomass & Bioenergy, 34(6), 883, 2010 |
| 8 |
How does petroleum price and corn yield volatility affect ethanol markets with and without an ethanol use mandate?
Thompson W, Meyer S, Westhoff P
Energy Policy, 37(2), 745, 2009 |
| 9 |
Opportunities and impediments to the expansion of forest bioenergy in Australia
Raison RJ
Biomass & Bioenergy, 30(12), 1021, 2006 |
