| 1 |
A computationally-efficient method for flamelet calculations
Lapointe S, Xuan Y, Kwon H, Whitesides RA, McNenly MJ
Combustion and Flame, 221, 94, 2020 |
| 2 |
The blending effect on the sooting tendencies of alternative/conventional jet fuel blends in non-premixed flames
Xue X, Hui X, Vannorsdall P, Singh P, Sung CJ
Fuel, 237, 648, 2019 |
| 3 |
Vision based algorithm for automated determination of smoke point of diesel blends
Rubio-Gomez G, Corral-Gomez L, Soriano JA, Gomez A, Castillo-Garcia FJ
Fuel, 235, 595, 2019 |
| 4 |
A minimalist functional group (MFG) approach for surrogate fuel formulation
Jameel AGA, Naser N, Issayev G, Touitou J, Ghosh MK, Emwas AH, Farooq A, Dooley S, Sarathy SM
Combustion and Flame, 192, 250, 2018 |
| 5 |
The sooting tendency of aviation biofuels and jet range paraffins: effects of adding aromatics, carbon chain length of normal paraffins, and fraction of branched paraffins
Duong LH, Reksowardojo IK, Soerawidjaja TH, Pham DN, Fujita O
Combustion Science and Technology, 190(10), 1710, 2018 |
| 6 |
Ignition delay time and sooting propensity of a kerosene aviation jet fuel and its derivative blended with a bio-jet fuel
Han HS, Kim CJ, Cho CH, Sohn CH, Han J
Fuel, 232, 724, 2018 |
| 7 |
Predicting the global combustion behaviors of petroleum-derived and alternative jet fuels by simple fuel property measurements
Won SH, Veloo PS, Dooley S, Santner J, Haas FM, Ju YG, Dryer FL
Fuel, 168, 34, 2016 |
| 8 |
Sooting tendencies of primary reference fuels in atmospheric laminar diffusion flames burning into vitiated air
Kashif M, Guibert P, Bonnety J, Legros G
Combustion and Flame, 161(6), 1575, 2014 |
