| 305 - 305 |
The US Chemical Safety Board, an Important Advocate for Process Safety, a Personal View
Murphy JF |
| 306 - 311 |
The US Chemical Safety Board: Moving Forward to Continually Drive Chemical Safety Change
Sutherland VA |
| 312 - 316 |
Dangerously Close: The CSB's Investigation into the Fatal Fire and Explosion in West, Texas
Banks J |
| 317 - 329 |
Paradigm Shift in the Regulatory Application of Safety Management Systems to Offshore Facilities
Maher ST, Long GD, Cromartie RS, Sutton IS, Steinhilber MR |
| 330 - 336 |
Personnel Safety with Pressurized Gas Systems
Cadwallader LC, Zhao HH |
| 337 - 340 |
A Framework for Critical Thinking in Process Safety Management
Baybutt P |
| 341 - 348 |
Evaluation of Uncertainty in Safety Integrity Level Calculations
Freeman R, Summers A |
| 349 - 359 |
Identify SIF and Specify Necessary SIL, and Other IPLs, as Part of PHA/HAZOP - or - Why It is Not Necessary to "Boldly Go beyond HAZOP and LOPA"
Bridges WG, Dowell AM |
| 360 - 364 |
Environmental Risk Assessment of a Biogas Station
Travnicek P, Kotek L, Junga P |
| 365 - 373 |
Application of Microfluidics Technology in Chemical Engineering for Enhanced Safety
Sun B, Jiang J, Shi N, Xu W |
| 374 - 391 |
Calorimetric Study of the Exothermic Decomposition of Dimethyl Sulfoxide
Brandes BT, Smith DK |
| 392 - 398 |
Consequence Modeling of Dynamic Source Terms
James M |
| 399 - 406 |
Dynamic Risk-Based Maintenance for Offshore Processing Facility
Bhandari J, Arzaghi E, Abbassi R, Garaniya V, Khan F |
| 407 - 413 |
Fire Extinguishment Behaviors of Liquid Fuel Using Liquid Nitrogen Jet
Shi BB, Zhou FB |
| 414 - 423 |
Full-Scale Experiments to Study Shock Waves Generated by the Rupture of a High-Pressure Pipeline
Wu JY, Long Y, Ji C, Xu QJ, Mao YM, Song KJ |
