| 325 - 325 |
Emergency management: It starts with a question in the design stages "What can go wrong?"
Murphy JF |
| 326 - 337 |
Reducing Process Safety Events: An approach proven by sustainable results
Champion J, Van Geffen S, Borrousch L |
| 338 - 352 |
Consequence modeling at the Eastman Kingsport site
James M, Skelton D |
| 353 - 361 |
Atmospheric tank failures: Mechanisms and an unexpected case study
Schmidt MS |
| 362 - 367 |
A new insight into the accident investigation: A case study of Tianjin Port fire and explosion in China
Zhou AT, Fan LP |
| 368 - 371 |
Explosion behavior of ammonia and ammonia/methane in oxygen-enriched air
Di Sarli V, Cammarota F, Salzano E, Di Benedetto A |
| 372 - 377 |
Effects of the explosion intensity on the distribution of flame region in a tunnel
Ma QJ, Chen JC, Zhang Q |
| 378 - 381 |
Chinese process safety management core elements and control measures
Zhou AT, Fan LP, Ma MF, Tao B |
| 382 - 391 |
A technique to control major hazards of the coal gasification process developed from critical events and safety barriers
Sun F, Xu W, Wang GJ, Sun B |
| 392 - 398 |
Introduction to functional safety assessments of safety controls, alarms, and interlocks: How efficient are your functional safety projects?
Roche E, Hochleitner M, Summers A |
| 399 - 407 |
Dynamic safety risk modeling of process systems using bayesian network
Zarei E, Azadeh A, Aliabadi MM, Mohammadfam I |
| 408 - 413 |
Method for CFD facilitated pressure rise calculation due to deflagration in heat recovery steam generator
Zhou W, Cardenas M, Moyeda D |
| 414 - 421 |
Process safety education and training academic education as a foundation for other process safety initiatives on education
Boogaerts G, Degreve J, Vercruysse G |
