1 - 6 |
Environmental justification for short-rotation forestry in Sweden Perttu KL |
7 - 15 |
Dynamic interaction of short rotations and conventional forestry in meeting demand for bioenergy in the least cost mitigation strategy Read P |
17 - 22 |
Sustainability and environmental issues associated with willow bioenergy development in New York (USA) Abrahamson LP, Robison DJ, Volk TA, White EH, Neuhauser EF, Benjamin WH, Peterson JM |
23 - 26 |
Genetic improvement of willow for short-rotation coppice Larsson S |
27 - 37 |
Profitability of willow cultivation for energy production in Finland Toivonen RM, Tahvanainen LJ |
39 - 47 |
Short rotation coppice for energy: Towards ecological guidelines Sage RB |
49 - 55 |
Environmental consequences when growing short rotation forests in Sweden Ledin S |
57 - 69 |
Environmental effects of growing woody crops on agricultural land: First year effects on erosion, and water quality Thornton FC, Joslin JD, Bock BR, Houston A, Green TH, Schoenholtz S, Pettry D, Tyler DD |
71 - 74 |
Use of municipal waste products in energy forestry: Highlights from 15 years of experience Hasselgren K |
75 - 81 |
Sustainable production of short rotation forest biomass crops using aqueous waste management systems Sims REH, Riddell-Black D |
83 - 92 |
Effect of peat ash fertilization on the nutrient status and biomass production of short-rotation willow on cut-away peatland area Hytonen J |
93 - 100 |
Environmental enhancement of US biomass crop technologies: Research results to date Tolbert VR, Wright LL |
101 - 107 |
Development of a water industry manual for biosolids use in short rotation forestry Riddell-Black D |
109 - 114 |
Short-rotation forestry: Discussion of 10 Austrian principles from the viewpoint of preservation of environment and nature Trinkaus P |