| 999 - 1000 |
Sustainable production systems for bioenergy: Forest energy in practice
Richardson J |
| 1001 - 1010 |
Energy trade-offs between intensive biomass utilization, site productivity loss, and ameliorative treatments in loblolly pine plantations
Scott DA, Dean TJ |
| 1011 - 1020 |
Availability of logging residues and potential for electricity production and carbon displacement in the USA
Gan JB, Smith CT |
| 1021 - 1024 |
Opportunities and impediments to the expansion of forest bioenergy in Australia
Raison RJ |
| 1025 - 1034 |
Evaluation of site impacts associated with three silvicultural prescriptions in an upland hardwood stand in northern Alabama, USA
Carter EA, Rummer RB, Stokes BJ |
| 1035 - 1042 |
A method for integrated extraction of logging residues and soil scarification on a small scale
Gullberg T, Johansson J |
| 1043 - 1052 |
Productivity and costs of slash bundling in Nordic conditions
Karha K, Vartiamaki T |
| 1053 - 1059 |
Tracing N, K, Mg and Ca released from decomposing biomass to new tree growth. Part I: A model system simulating harvest residue decomposition on conventionally harvested clearfell sites
Weatherall A, Proe MF, Craig J, Cameron AD, Mckay HM, Midwood AJ |
| 1060 - 1066 |
Tracing N, K, Mg and Ca released from decomposing biomass to new tree growth. Part II: A model system simulating root decomposition on clearfell sites
Weatherall A, Proe MF, Craig J, Cameron AD, Mckay HM, Midwood AJ |
| 1067 - 1075 |
A model to estimate fossil CO2 emissions during the harvesting of forest residues for energy-with an application on the case of chipping
Van Belle JF |
| 1076 - 1081 |
Opportunities to boost bioenergy in Lithuania
Silveira S, Andersson L, Lebedys A |
