1 - 8 |
Modeling an active solar still for sea water desalination process optimization Hamadou OA, Abdellatif K |
9 - 16 |
Effect of granular activated carbon filter on the subsequent flocculation in seawater treatment Nguyen TV, Jeong S, Pham TTN, Kandasamy J, Vigneswaran S |
17 - 22 |
Enhanced efficiency of salt removal from brine for cyclopentane hydrates by washing, centrifuging, and sweating Han S, Shin JY, Rhee YW, Kang SP |
23 - 29 |
Improving desalination by coupling membrane capacitive deionization with microbial desalination cell Wen QX, Zhang HC, Yang H, Chen ZG, Nan J, Feng YJ |
30 - 38 |
A short review on reverse osmosis pretreatment technologies Jamaly S, Darwish NN, Ahmed I, Hasan SW |
39 - 52 |
Design and selection of curved vane demisters using Taguchi based CFD analysis Venkatesan G, Kulasekharan N, Iniyan S |
53 - 61 |
Application of vacuum membrane distillation for small scale drinking water production Naidu G, Jeong S, Choi Y, Jang E, Hwang TM, Vigneswaran S |
62 - 67 |
Polypyrrole/carbon nanotube composites as cathode material for performance enhancing of capacitive deionization technology Wang Y, Zhang LW, Wu YF, Xu SC, Wang JX |
68 - 75 |
Modeling and optimization of air gap membrane distillation system for desalination He QF, Li PL, Geng HX, Zhang CY, Wang J, Chang HY |
76 - 86 |
Characterization and modeling of radial flow membrane (RFM) module in ultrafiltration Sarkar D, Chakraborty D, Naskar M, Bhattacharjee C |
87 - 96 |
Fouling mechanisms of the extract of traditional Chinese medicine in ultrafiltration Liu HB, Tang ZS, Cui CL, Sun C, Zhu HX, Li B, Guo LW |
97 - 106 |
Assessment of micellar solutions as draw solutions for forward osmosis Gadelha G, Nawaz MS, Hankins NP, Khan SJ, Wang R, Tang CYY |
107 - 115 |
Preparation and characterization of cross-linked quaternised polyvinyl alcohol membrane/activated carbon composite electrode for membrane capacitive deionization Tian GY, Liu L, Meng QH, Cao B |
116 - 124 |
Effect of particle size distribution on turbidity under various water quality levels during flocculation processes Yao M, Nan J, Chen T |
125 - 142 |
A comparison between blending and surface deposition methods for the preparation of iron oxide/polysulfone nanocomposite membranes Homayoonfal M, Mehrnia MR, Shariaty-Niassar M, Akbari A, Ismail AF, Matsuura T |
143 - 152 |
Physical modification of polytetrafluoroethylene flat membrane by a simple heat setting process and membrane wetting remission in SGMD for desalination Wang F, Li JM, Zhu HL, Zhang HP, Tang HY, Chen JY, Guo YH |
153 - 159 |
Comparison of iron (III) and alum salt on ultrafiltration membrane fouling by alginate Ma BW, Yu WZ, Liu HJ, Qu JH |
160 - 179 |
Multifunctional carbon nanotubes in water treatment: The present, past and future Das R, Hamid SBA, Ali ME, Ismail AF, Annuar MSM, Ramakrishna S |
180 - 180 |
A comparative study of boron and arsenic (III) rejection from brackish water by reverse osmosis membranes (vol 310, pg 109, 2013) Teychene B, Collet G, Gallard H, Crone JP |
181 - 188 |
Desalination combined with hexavalent chromium reduction in a microbial desalination cell An ZY, Zhang HC, Wen QX, Chen ZQ, Du MA |
189 - 199 |
The effect of UV irradiation on PSf/TiO2 mixed matrix membrane for chromium rejection Jyothi MS, Nayak V, Padaki M, Balakrishna RG, Ismail AF |