Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, Vol.42, No.3, 48-55, 2003
Mobility of gas-in-oil dispersions in enhanced solution gas drive (foamy oil) exploitation of heavy oil reservoirs
In the cold production of foamy heavy oil under solution gas drive, the oil and the released solution gas are believed to flow in the form of a gas-in-oil dispersion. The mobility of such a dispersion is an important issue in the mathematical modelling of the cold production process. However, very little factual information is available in the literature on the mobility of gas-in-heavy oil dispersions. The objective of this work was to fill this gap in our knowledge of foamy oil flow behaviour by measuring the mobility of gas-in-heavy oil dispersions under varying conditions. A new apparatus was developed for measuring gas-in-oil dispersion mobility as a function of the dispersed gas fraction and the pressure gradient. It uses a sand-pack holder with three sections of different diameter to produce three different pressure gradients in the same flow test. An in-line mixer was used to generate live oil for producing the foamy dispersions. Several: validation tests were conducted to check the equipment and procedures. Tests were carried out with a viscous mineral oil, as well as with a heavy crude oil. At a low gas fraction, such as would exist immediately below! the bubble point pressure in the reservoir, the apparent viscosity! of a gas-in-oil dispersion was higher than that of the live oil at the bubble point pressure. At high gas fractions, the apparent: viscosity of the dispersion was lower than that of the live oil at the bubble point pressure. The boundary between low gas fraction and high gas fraction was in the 15% - 20% gas fraction; range. Therefore, in the interval 0 to 15% - 20% gas' fraction, the apparent viscosity increases with increasing gas fraction, and then at higher gas fractions, it decreases with increasing gas fraction. The apparent viscosity was also found to vary significantly with the pressure gradient; in general, increasing with increasing pressure gradient. In terms of the relative permeability, it was found that me oil,, relative permeability varied significantly with pressure gradient: and displayed a value of higher than unity at an optimum combination of the values of the pressure gradient and fractional flow of oil. The gas relative permeability remained low in all tests. A comparison of the mineral oil tests with the crude oil tests showed that the two systems behaved similarly.