화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.18, No.6, 2103-2114, November, 2012
Methane reforming to syngas over LaNixFe1-xO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) mixed-oxide perovskites in the presence of CO2 and O2
E-mail:
The perovskite metal-oxides LaNixFe1-xO3 (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) were synthesized by a sol.gel method and investigated for the DR, POM, and CRM into synthesis gas. The catalysts were characterized by using XRD, BET, CA, SEM, EDS, HR-TEM, EDX and TPR in order to investigate the influence of the preparation parameters and evaluation condition. LaNi0.4Fe0.6O3 showed great stability, and fewer carbon deposits were detected on the spent catalyst after 1800 min evaluation on TOS. The effect of GHSV on the catalytic performance was investigated. The results obtained showed the H2/CO molar-ratio was around 0.9, 1.7, and 1.1 over different catalysts for DR, POM and CRM, respectively.
  1. Rasmussen FB, Sehested J, Teunissen HT, Molenbroek AM, Clausen BS, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 267(1-2), 165 (2004)
  2. Armor JN, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 176(2), 159 (1999)
  3. Villacampa JI, Royo C, Romeo E, Montoya JA, Del Angel P, Monzon A, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 252(2), 363 (2003)
  4. Rostrup-Nielsen JR, Catalysis Today., 18(4), 305 (1993)
  5. Arandiyan HR, Parvari M, Journal of Natural Gas Chemistry., 17(3), 213 (2008)
  6. Gonza´ lez O, et al., Catalysis Today., 107/108, 436 (2005)
  7. Takehira K, Shishido T, Kondo M, J. Catal., 207(2), 307 (2002)
  8. Goldwasser MR, et al., Catalysis Today., 107/108, 106 (2005)
  9. Tsyganok AI, Inaba M, Tsunoda T, Suzuki K, Takehira K, Hayakawa T, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 275(1-2), 149 (2004)
  10. de Araujo GC, et al., Catalysis Today., 107/108, 906 (2005)
  11. Gallego GS, Mondragon F, Barrault J, Tatibouet JM, Batiot-Dupeyrat C, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 311, 164 (2006)
  12. Lima SMD, Assaf JM, Materials Research., 5, 329 (2002)
  13. Provendier H, Petit C, Estournes C, Libs S, Kiennemann A, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 180(1-2), 163 (1999)
  14. Provendier H, et al., Comptes Rendus de l’Acade´mie des Sciences - Series IIC - Chemistry, 4, 57 (2001)
  15. Roger AC, Petit C, Kiennemann A, J. Catal., 167(2), 447 (1997)
  16. Araujo GCD, et al., Catalysis Today., 133/135, 129 (2008)
  17. Tsang SC, Claridge JB, Green ML, Catal. Today, 23(1), 3 (1995)
  18. Erdohelyi A, Cserenyi J, Papp E, Solymosi F, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 108(2), 205 (1994)
  19. Kroll VC, Swaan HM, Mirodatos C, J. Catal., 161(1), 409 (1996)
  20. Kroll VCH, et al., A Mechanistic Study. Journal of Catalysis., 164(2), 387 (1996)
  21. Lima SM, Assaf JM, Pena MA, Fierro JLG, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 311, 94 (2006)
  22. Valderrama G, Kiennemann A, Goldwasser MR, J. Power Sources, 195(7), 1765 (2010)
  23. Arandiyan HR, Parvari M, Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering., 26, 63 (2009)
  24. Parvary M, et al., Catalysis Communications., 2(11-12), 357 (2001)
  25. Souza MMVM, Schmal M, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 255(1), 83 (2003)
  26. Joint Committee on Powder Diffraction Standard, International Centre for Diffraction Data, Pennsylvania (1997)
  27. Rakshit S, Gopalakrishnan PS, Journal of Solid State Chemistry., 110(1), 28 (1994)
  28. El-Shobaky HG, Radwan NRE, Thermochim. Acta, 398(1-2), 223 (2003)
  29. Lwin Y, Daud WRW, Mohamad AB, Yaakob Z, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 25(1), 47 (2000)