화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.19, No.2, 508-522, March, 2013
A novel configuration of decalin and hydrogen loop in optimized thermally coupled reactors in GTL technology via differential evolution method
E-mail:
In this study, decalin and hydrogen looping approach is proposed in optimized thermally coupled membrane ternary reactors in gas-to-liquid technology (GTL). This novel configuration is named thermally coupled membrane ternary reactor (TCMTR), in which decalin dehydrogenation reaction is coupled with Fischer.Tropsch synthesis (FTS) reactions. Three different reactors are fabricated and integrated with membrane reactor where decalin and hydrogen are produced and utilized simultaneously. Under the optimized operating conditions of TCMTR via differential evolution method, decalin can be properly utilized in this novel configuration as a hydrogen carrier and the required decalin can be produced within the continuous loop and a slight amount of decalin is required for supplementation. 4.77% of the produced hydrogen in the first reactor is utilized in FTS reactions in the second reactor and the remaining 95.23% is utilized in hydrogenation reaction of naphthalene in the third reactor which leads to decalin production as a reactant of the first reactor. A comparison is made between the performances of optimized TCMTR (OTCMTR), conventional tubular reactor (CR) and thermally coupled membrane dual-type reactor (TCMDR). Significant decrease in decalin consumption rate can be achieved in this new scheme, and the hydrogen storage problem and no requirement for injection of fresh feed in each process. The results demonstrate the superiority of OTCMTR to all previously proposed configurations. Furthermore, the hydrogen storage problem is properly addressed by OTCMTR and significant decrease in decalin consumption rate can be achieved in this new scheme.
  1. Tavasoli A, Trepanier M, Abbaslou RMM, Dalai AK, Abatzoglou N, Fuel Process. Technol., 90(12), 1486 (2009)
  2. Sie ST, Krishna R, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 186(1-2), 55 (1999)
  3. Wang YG, Shah N, Huggins FE, Huffman GP, Energy Fuels, 20(6), 2612 (2006)
  4. Hodoshima S, Arai H, Saito Y, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 28, 197 (2003)
  5. Hodoshima S, Arai H, Saito Y, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 28, 1255 (2003)
  6. Hodoshima S, Takaiwa S, Shono A, Satoh K, Saito Y, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 283(1-2), 235 (2005)
  7. Wang B, Goodman DW, Froment GF, J. Catal., 253(2), 229 (2008)
  8. Yin FX, Ji SF, Mei H, Zhou ZL, Li CY, Chem. Eng. J., 155(1-2), 285 (2009)
  9. Kulkarni MS, Dudukovic MP, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal., 42, 2897 (1996)
  10. Marvast MA, Sohrabi M, Zarrinpashne S, Baghmisheh G, Chem. Eng. Technol., 28(1), 78 (2005)
  11. Fischer.Tropsch Pilot Plant of Research Institute of Petroleum Industry and National Iranian Oil Company (RIPI-NIOC), Tehran 18745-4163, Iran (2004)
  12. Forghani AA, Elekaei H, Rahimpour MR, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 34, 3965 (2009)
  13. Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K, Energy, 36(2), 1223 (2011)
  14. Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 36, 2992 (2011)
  15. Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 36(8), 4917 (2011)
  16. Rahimpour MR, Mirvakili A, Paymooni K, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 36(12), 6970 (2011)
  17. Sebastia´ n D, Bordeje´ EG, Calvillo L, La´ zaro MJ, Moliner R, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 33, 1329 (2008)
  18. Mohan K, Govind R, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal., 32, 2083 (1986)
  19. Mohan K, Govind R, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal., 1493 (1988)
  20. Unruh D, Rohde MP, Schaub G, Studies in Surface Science and Catalysis., 153, 191 (2004)
  21. Gielens FC, Tong HD, Vorstman MAG, Keurentjes JTF, J. Membr. Sci., 289(1-2), 15 (2007)
  22. Hsiung TH, Christman DD, Hunter EJ, Homyak AR, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal., 45, 204 (1999)
  23. Rohde MP, Schaub G, Khajavi S, Jansen JC, Kapteyn F, Microporous and Mesoporous Materials., 115, 123 (2008)
  24. Wang YN, Xu YY, Xiang HW, Li YW, Zhang BJ, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 40(20), 4324 (2001)
  25. Gallucci F, Paturzo L, Basile A, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 43(10), 2420 (2004)
  26. Pandu Rangaiah G, Multi-Objective Optimization: Techniques and Applications in Chemical Engineering, Advances in Process Systems Engineering, vol. 1, National . University of Singapore, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. (2009)
  27. Parvasi P, Khosravanipour Mostafazadeh A, Rahimpour MR, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 34, 3717 (2009)
  28. Rahimpour MR, Iranshahi D, Bahmanpour AM, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 35, 7498 (2010)
  29. Rahimpour MR, Parvasi P, Setoodeh P, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 3(4), 6221 (2009)
  30. Khademi MH, Rahimpour MR, Jahanmiri A, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 35, 1936 (2010)
  31. Khademi MH, Setoodeh P, Rahimpour MR, Jahanmiri A, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy., 34, 6930 (2009)
  32. Itoh N, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Journal., 33, 1576 (1987)
  33. Smith JM, Van Ness HC, Abbot MM, Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamic, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (2001)
  34. Perry RH, Green DW, Maloney JO, Perry’s Chemical Engineers’ Handbook, seventh ed., McGraw-Hill (1997)
  35. Reid RC, Sherwood TK, Prausnitz J, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, third ed., McGraw-Hill, New York (1977)
  36. Cussler EL, Diffusion, Mass Transfer in Fluid Systems, University Press, Cambridge (1984)
  37. Wilke CR, Chemical Engineering Progress., 45, 218 (1949)
  38. Smith JM, Chemical Engineering Kinetics, McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)
  39. Graaf GH, Scholtens H, Stamhuis EJ, Beenackers AACM, Chemical Engineering Science., 45, 773 (1990)