Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.30, No.6, 1301-1311, June, 2013
Effect of drainage channel dimensions on the performance of wave-plate mist eliminators
E-mail:
We investigated the effects of drainage channel dimensions on droplet removal efficiency and pressure drop of the gas droplet flow in a wave-plate mist eliminator. Droplet dispersion in turbulent gas flows is numerically simulated using eddy interaction model (EIM) and Eulerian-Lagrangian method. Reynolds stress transport model (RSTM) with enhanced wall treatment and shear stress transport (SST) k-ω model are used for simulating the turbulent airflow. Comparison between the numerical simulations and available experimental data shows that eddy lifetime constant (CL) can affect the results significantly, and by selecting suitable values of the eddy lifetime constant, both turbulence models give reasonable predictions of droplet removal efficiency. Simulations of gas droplet flow in the eliminators with various drainage channel dimensions show that the drainage channel length (LDC) has a greater effect on droplet removal efficiency than the drainage channel width (WDC).
Keywords:Numerical Simulation;Wave-plate MistEliminator;Drainage Channel Dimensions;Removal Efficiency;Eddy Lifetime Constant
- Azzopardi BJ, Sanaullah KS, Chem. Eng. Sci., 57(17), 3557 (2002)
- Berlemont A, Desjonqueres P, Gouesbet G, Int. J. Multiphase Flow., 16, 19 (1990)
- Brunazzi E, Ghetti S, Merello C, Paglianti A, in Proceedings of Convegno Gricu, 625 (2004)
- Burkholz A, Droplet separation, VCH Publishers, New York, USA (1989)
- Burry D, Bergeles G, Int. J. Multiphase Flow., 19, 65 (1993)
- Calvert S, Jashnani IL, Yung S, J. Air Pollution Control Association., 24, 967 (1974)
- Galletti C, Brunazzi E, Tognotti L, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63(23), 5639 (2008)
- Ghetti S, Sc M. Thesis, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy (in Italian) (2003)
- Greenfeld C, Quarini G, ASME fluids engineering division summer meeting, June 22 (1997)
- Hanjalic K, Launder BE, J. Fluid Mechnol., 51, 301 (1972)
- Hinds WC, Aerosol technology: Properties, behavior, and measurement of airborne particles, Wiley, New York (1982)
- Houghton HG, Radford WH, Transactions of the American Institution of Chemical Engineers., 35, 427 (1939)
- James PW, Wang Y, Azzopardi BJ, Hughes JP, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 81(6), 639 (2003)
- James PW, Azzopardi BJ, Wang Y, Hughes JP, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 83(A5), 469 (2005)
- Jøsang AI, Chr M. Melaaen, in 42nd Scandinavian Conference on Simulation and Modeling Porsgrunn, Norway, October 8 (2001)
- Jøsang AI, Ph.D. Thesis, Dep. of Technol. (HiT-TF), Telemark Univ. Coll., Norway (2002)
- McNulty KJ, Monat JP, Hansen OV, Chem. Eng. Progress., 83, 48 (1987)
- Menter FR, AIAA J., 32, 1598 (1994)
- Phillips H, Deakin AW, in 4th Annual Meeting of the Aerosol Society Loughborough, UK (1990)
- Rafee R, Rahimzadeh H, Ahmadi G, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 88(10A), 1393 (2010)
- Rafee R, Rahimzadeh H, Iran J. Chem. Chem. Eng., 29, 97 (2010)
- Sommerfeld M, Kohnen G, Ruger M, in 9th Symp. Turbulent Shear Flows, Kyoto, Japan, August 16 (1993)
- Tian L, Ahmadi G, J. Aerosol Sci., 38, 377 (2007)
- Verlaan CCJ, Ph.D. Thesis, Delft University of Technology, Delft, the Netherlands (1991)
- Wang Y, Davies GA, IChemE Part A: Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 74, 232 (1996)
- Wang Y, James PW, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 76(8), 980 (1998)
- Wang Y, James PW, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 77(8), 692 (1999)
- Wilkinson D, IMechE Part E: Proc. Instn. Mech. Eng., 213, 265 (1999)
- Zamora B, Kaiser AS, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66(6), 1232 (2011)
- Zhou Q, Leschziner MA, in 8th Symp. Turbulent Shear Flows, Technical University of Munich, Germany, September (1991)