화학공학소재연구정보센터
Clean Technology, Vol.19, No.2, 173-183, June, 2013
적용 가능한 유니소재화 대상제품 발굴 및 사례 연구
Case Study on the Target Products for Applicable Uni-materailization
E-mail:
초록
전 세계적으로 자원순환 효율성 증대 및 에너지 절감을 위해 친환경제품 설계, 재활용, 재제조 등 다양한 방법론이 제시되고 있다. 본 논문은 하나의 방안으로 유니소재화에 대해서 제시하고 있다. 유니소재화는 제품 재활용이 용이하고 유해물질 사용을 저감하기 위해 설계, 생산, 수거, 재활용 등을 고려한 기존 제품의 소재의 단일화(단순화)로 정의한다. 본 연구에서는 적용 가능한 유니소재화 대상제품을 평가할 수 있는 정성적, 정량적 평가 항목을 개발하였다. 평가항목은 경제성, 기술성, 환경성을 고려하여 총 9가지로 구성되어 있으며 평가항목을 적용하여 4가지 대상제품에 대해 사례를 연구했다. 연구 결과, 블라인드형 창문을 제외한 3가지 대상제품은 유니소재화 제품으로 적용이 가능하며 평가항목의 객관성을 높이기 위해서는 유니소재화의 개념을 구체화하고 산업별 특성을 고려하여 평가할 필요가 있다.
A various methodologies like eco product design, recycling, remanufacturing have been proposed for the increase of resource recirculation and energy saving worldwide. Uni-materialization in this paper, one of measures is presented. Uni-materialization is defined as the unification or simplification of material that is easy resource recycling and reduce waste generation at source during product design, manufacturing, delivery, use and disposal. This study developed calculates the qualitative and quantitative of assessment index for evaluating target products applicable uni-materialization. There are 9 assessment articles considered economic performance, technological property and environmental property and a study on target product applied assessment indexes. As a result it is possible for 3 target products to apply uni-materialization product except for a window blind, and the concrete concept of uni-materialization for improving objectivity of assessment index and the consideration of industrial distinct character are needed.
  1. Ju HS, Cho BO, Park JG, Clean Technol., 15(2), 137 (2009)
  2. http://www.kncpc.or.kr/clean/material.asp
  3. Charter M, Tischner U, Sustainable Product Design, Greenleaf, Sheffield, 263 (2001)
  4. The Korean Institute of Resources Recycling, A White Paper of Recycling, Chungmungak, Paju, 67 (2009)
  5. Unruh GC, “The Biosphere Rules,” Harvard Business Re view, February (2008)
  6. Platcheck ER, Schaeffer L, Kindlein WJ, Candido LHA, J. Cleaner Prod., 16, 1526 (2008)
  7. Cerdan C, Gazulla C, Raugei M, Martinez E, Fullana-i-Palmer P, J. Cleaner Prod., 17, 1638 (2009)
  8. Allwood JM, Ashby MF, Gutowski TG, Worrell E, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 55, 362 (2011)
  9. Ministry of Knowledge Economy, Operating Standards of New Technology Certification System (2011)
  10. Ministry of Environment, Product Category Rules (PCRs) of Carbon Footprint Labeling (2011)
  11. Kim SY, “A Study on Valuation Framework of Technology Competitiveness for Small Medium IT Manufacturing Company," Master Dissertation, Yonsei University, Seoul (2006)
  12. Korea Institute of Industry and Technology Information, “How to Evaluate the Valuation of Technology,” June (2000)