화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea Polymer Journal, Vol.2, No.2, 75-79, October, 1994
Compatibility of Poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate) and Poly(butylene terephthalate) Blends
Blends of poly(ethylene 2,6-naphthalate)(PEN) and poly(butylene terephthalate) (PBT) were prepared by both solution and melt methods. Any significant difference was not observed for the glass transition and melting temperatures. These blends showed a partial compatibility based on the glass transition temperatures. PEN and PBT crystallized separately to exhibit two melting temperatures. The crystallization rate of PEN in PEN-rich blends was not affected by the PVT content, while that of PVT in PVT-rich blends decreased with an increase of the PEN content. By comparing the experimental modulus and strength with those predicted from Kleiner's and Paul's model, PEN/PBT blends can be described to have some compatibility throughout the compositions.
  1. Jpn. Kokai Koho, Teijin Co. Ltd., 82(25), 439 (1982)
  2. Kishida Y, Jpn. Kokai Koho, 80(30), 433 (1980)
  3. Fukushima N, Jpn. Kokai Koho, 79(116), 53 (1979)
  4. Escala A, Stein RS, Adv. Chem. Ser., 176, 455 (1979)
  5. Traugott T, Barlow JW, Paul DR, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 28, 2947 (1983) 
  6. Barlow JW, Paul DR, Polym. Eng. Sci., 24, 525 (1984) 
  7. Woo EM, Barlow JW, Paul DR, J. Polym. Sci. Polym. Symp., 71, 137 (1984)
  8. Stell JR, Paul DR, Barlow JW, Polym. Eng. Sci., 16, 496 (1976) 
  9. Yoon KH, Lee SC, Park OO, Polym. J., 26, 816 (1994) 
  10. Yoon KH, Lee SC, Park OO, Polym. Eng. Sci., in press
  11. Ziabicki A, Fundamentals of Fiber Formation, John Wiley, New York (1976)
  12. Nielson LE, Rheol. Acta, 13, 86 (1974) 
  13. Kleiner LW, Karasz FE, Nacknight WJ, Polym. Eng. Sci., 19, 319 (1979) 
  14. Nolley E, Barlow JW, Paul DR, Polym. Eng. Sci., 20, 364 (1980)