화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.31, No.10, 1798-1809, October, 2014
DOI10.1007/s11814-014-0107-2  Export Citation
Intercross real-time control strategy in a novel phased isolation tank step feed process for treating low C/N real wastewater under ambient temperature
Rusul Naseer Mohammed1, 2, Saad Abu-Alhail1, 2, and Lu Xi Wu1, 3, †
  • 1School of Energy and Environment, Southeast University, Sipailou Road, Nanjing 210096, P. R. China
  • 2Faculty of Engineering, University of Basrah, Basra, Iraq
  • 3Engineering Research Center of Taihu Lake Water Environment, Southeast University, Linghu Avenue Road, Wuxi 214135, China
E-mail:
The paper presents a study correlating the profile of on-line monitoring parameters and off-line measurement of nutrient concentrations (NH4+-N, TN, NO3--N and TP) in a novel technology phased isolation tank step feed (PITSF) system, thereby utilizing the parameters as economical operational tool. A fixed-time control study showed that real control points (RCPs) on pH and oxidation-reduction potential (ORP) profiles accurately coincided with the major biological activities, whereas both DO and pH profiles are applied to control the end of nitrification and phosphate uptake process in aerobic phases, in particular, the “ammonia valley” on the pH profile for nitrification process. The analysis of the first aerobic tanks during the main phases showed that the RCP on DO profile can be used to distinguish the occurrence of simultaneous denitrification and nitrification (SND). Both the RCPs on the ORP profile and “nitrate apex” on the pH profile are applied to control the end of denitrification. The relationship between ORP and phosphorus release is linear and both (dORP/dt) and (dpH/dt) values are applied to control the end of anaerobic phosphorus release. Therefore, a new, reliable and effective real-time control strategy was developed using DO, pH and ORP as control parameters, to improve the performance of the PITSF process. As a final engineering observation, the proposed system is regarded as an effective process because the PITSF system can be operated safely under intercross real time control to treat low C/N domestic wastewater. The total nutrient removal efficiencies of COD, TN, NH4+-N, and TP with low C/N ratio and normal water temperature of (17-21) ℃ were 91.7, 83.2, 95.7 and 92.1%, respectively, which was approximately equal to the complete nitrification-denitrification with the addition of external carbon sources under low water temperature of (8-11) ℃.
Keywords:On-line Monitoring Parameters (ORP;DO and pH);PITSF;Nutrient Removal;Low C/N Ratio
  1. Ma SH, He XH, Water and Wastewater, 29(9), 89 (2003)
  2. Rusul N, Saad A, Lu XU, Saudi Journal of Biol. Sci., 20(1), 1 (2013)
  3. Ra CS, Lo KV, Mavinic DS, Environ. Technol., 19(4), 343 (1998)
  4. Lo CK, Yu CW, Tam NFY, Trayor S, Water Res., 28(10), 2087 (1994)
  5. Plisson S, Capdeville B, Mauret M, Deguin A, Baptiste P, J. Water Sci. Technol., 33(1), 275 (1996)
  6. Charpentier J, Martin G, Wacheux H, Gilles P, Water Sci. Technol., 38(3), 197 (1998)
  7. Chen K,Chen C,Peng J,Houng J, Water Res., 36, 230 (2002)
  8. Fuerhacker M,Bauer H,Ellinger R,Sree U,Schmid H,Zibuschka F,Puxbaum H, Water Res., 34(9), 2499 (2000)
  9. Holman JB,Wareham DG, Biochem. Eng., 22(2), 125 (2005)
  10. Guo JH, Yang Q, Peng YZ, Yang AM, Wang SY, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 40(6), 1564 (2007)
  11. Obaja D, Mace S, Costa J, Sans C, Mata-Alvarez J, Bioresour. Technol., 87(1), 103 (2003)
  12. Puig S, Corominas L, Vives MT, Balaguer MD, Colprim J, Colomer J, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 44(9), 3367 (2005)
  13. Choi HJ, Lee SM, Water Environ. Res., 18, 235 (2013)
  14. APHA (American Public Health Association), Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 19th Ed., Washington DC, USA: American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation (1995)
  15. Lee DS, Jeon CO, Park JM, Water Res., 35, 3968 (2001)
  16. Tay JH, Liu QS, Liu Y, J. Appl. Microbiol., 91(1), 168 (2001)
  17. Zhang L, Wei C, Kefang Z, Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng., 32, 175 (2009)
  18. Liu YC, Shi HC, Xia L, Shi HM, Shen TG, Wang ZQ, Wang G, Wang YZ, Bioresour. Technol., 101(3), 901 (2010)
  19. Robertson LA, Dalsgaard T, Revsbech NP, Kuenen JG, J. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol., 18, 113 (1995)
  20. Patureau D, Bouchez T, Dabert P, Bernet N, Godon JJ, Delgenes JP, Moletta R, Description and performance of an aerobic denitrifying consortium compared with those of an aerobic denitri-fie microvirgula aerodenitrificans, Proceedings of New Advances in Biological Nitrogen and Phosphorus Removal for Municipal or Industrial Wastewaters, Narbonne, France, Oct. 1998, 61-68 (1998)
  21. Cui YW, Wang SY, Li J, Chin. J. Chem. Eng., 17(3), 484 (2009)
  22. Ma J, Peng C, Takigawa A, Wang S, Wang L, Ma N, Liu Y, Peng Y, Water Sci. Technol., 62, 2028 (2010)
  23. Kang SJ, Olmstead K, Municipal nutrient removal technologies reference document, Volume 1, Technical Report, EPA 832-R-08-006, September (2008)