화학공학소재연구정보센터
Clean Technology, Vol.20, No.3, 314-320, September, 2014
혼합냉매 조성에 따른 C3MR 천연가스 액화공정 성능 비교
Effects of Compositions of Mixed Refrigerants on the Performance of a C3MR Natural Gas Liquefaction Process
E-mail:
초록
이번 연구의 목적은 세계적으로 널리 이용되고 있고, 액화 효율이 높은 Air Products and Chemicals Inc. (APCI) 社의 C3MR (Propane Pre-cooled & Mixed Refrigerants) 천연가스 액화공정에 사용되는 혼합냉매의 최적 조성을 통계학적 기법으로 결정하는 것이다. 공정모사는 상업 공정 모사기를 이용했으며 혼합냉매는 methane (C1), ethane (C2), propane (C3)과 nitrogen (N2)로 선택하였다. 그리고 혼합물 설계(mixture design, MD)와 중심합성계획법(central composite design, CCD)을 이용하여 전체 공정의 에너지 소비가 최소가 되게 하는 최적의 혼합냉매 조성을 결정하였다. 연구결과 기존 설계 대비 최대 11.28%의 에너지 소비 절감을 확인하였다. 또한 주 극저온 열교환기(main cryogenic heat exchanger, MCHE)의 온도 프로파일을 통해 열적 효율성도 함께 비교하였다.
The purpose of this work is to optimize composition of mixture refrigerants used in the C3MR (Propane & Mixed Refrigerants) process by a statistical optimization technique. C3MR studied in this work is one of widely used commercial natural gas liquefaction processes with high efficiency. Process simulation was performed in a commercial process simulator and methane (C1), ethane (C2), propane (C3), and nitrogen (N2) were selected as mixed refrigerants. Using the process model, optimum composition of refrigerants mixture was determined via mixture design and central composite design to produce minimum energy consumption. As a result, it was confirmed that energy consumption is reduced down to 11.3% comparing to existing design. It was also compared with heat effectiveness through temperature profile of MCHE (main cryogenic heat exchanger).
  1. Chang HS, Lee BN, Gu BS, Construction Economy Res. Inst. Korea, 19, 2 (2007)
  2. Cha JH, Lee JC, Roh MI, Lee KY, JSNAK, 47, 733 (2010)
  3. Shukri T, Hydro. Eng., 9(2), 71 (2004)
  4. Cao WS, Lu XS, Lin WS, Gu AZ, Appl. Therm. Eng., 26, 898 (2006)
  5. Barclay MA, Yang CC, “Offshore LNG: The Perfect Starting Point for the 2-phase Expander,” Offshore Technology Conference 2006, Houston, TX 1-4 May (2006)
  6. Finn AJ, Johnson GL, Tomlinson TR, “LNG Technology for Offshore and Mid-Scale Plants. Proceedings of the Seventy-Ninth Annual Convention of the Gas Processors Association, pp. 429-450, Atlanta, Georgia, Mar. 13-15 (2000)
  7. Kennett AJ, Limb DI, Czarnecki BA, “Offshore Liquefaction of Associated Gas - A Suitable Process for the North Sea,” Proceedings of 13th Offshore Technology Conference, pp. 31-40. (1981)
  8. Little WA, Method for Efficient Counter-current Heat Exchange Using Optimized Mixtures. U.S. Patent 5,644,502, (1997)
  9. Alexeev A, Quack H, Refrigerant mixture for a mixture throttling process. U.S. Patent 6,513,338 (2003)
  10. Gong MQ, Luo EC, Zhou Y, Liang JT, Zhang L, Adv. Cryog. Eng., 45, 283 (2000)
  11. Boiarskii M, Khatri A, Kovalenko V, Cryocoolers, 10, 457 (2002)
  12. Chang HM, Chung MJ, Lee S, Choe KH, Cryogenics, 51, 278 (2011)
  13. Lee S, Nguyen VDL, Lee M, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51(30), 10021 (2012)
  14. Robert CR, The Properties of Gases and Liquids, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill (1987)
  15. Helgestad DE, Modelling and Optimization of the C3MR Process for Liquefaction of Natural Gas, http://www.nt.ntnu.no/users/skoge/diplom/prosjekt09/helgestad/Helgestad_project.pdf.
  16. Venkatarathnam G, Cryogenic Mixed Refrigerant Processes, Springer (2008)
  17. Hwang JH, Roh MI, Lee KY, Comput. Chem. Eng., 49, 25 (2013)
  18. Min HK, Hong SB, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 51(1), 1 (2013)
  19. Kim HJ, Lee JY, Kim WB, Park CK, “Basic Design of Mixed Refrigerant Cycle in Bench Scale Unit LNG Plant’s Liquefaction Process,” SAREK, pp. 729-734 (2009)
  20. Kim SM, Kim DK, Lee JS, Park SC , Rhee YW, Clean Technol., 18(1), 102 (2012)