The catalytic performance of Ni-based supercritical water gasification (SCWG) catalysts may be influenced strongly by the nature of support. In this paper, Ni catalysts with the different supports (CeO2/Al2O3, La2O3/Al2O3, MgO/Al2O3, ZrO2/Al2O3) were prepared by two-step impregnation method. The fresh and used catalysts were characterized by X-ray diffraction patterns (XRD), scanning electron microscopy with an Energy Dispersive X-ray (SEM-EDX), Brunauer Emmett Teller (BET) specific surface area measurements, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Thermo-gravimetric analyses (TGA). The catalyst performance testing was conducted by SCWG of glucose at 673 K and 23.5 MPa with an autoclave reactor, to evaluate the influence of support on the hydrogen production. The results showed that H-2 yield for different supports decreased in order: CeO2/Al2O3 > La2O3/Al2O3 > MgO/Al2O3 > Al2O3 > ZrO2/Al2O3, and H-2 selectivity decreased in order: CeO2/Al2O3 > La2O3/Al2O3 > ZrO2/Al2O3 > Al2O3 > MgO/Al2O3. Ni catalysts were deactivated in SCWG reaction because of sintering and coke deposition. Compared with other supports, CeO2 can be used as the promoter of carbon removal from catalyst surfaces. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.