화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Chemical Engineering Research, Vol.54, No.2, 171-174, April, 2016
DOI10.9713/kcer.2016.54.2.171  Export Citation
효소연료전지의 Cathode 제조조건이 OCV에 미치는 영향
Effect of Fabrication Method of Cathode on OCV in Enzyme Fuel Cells
이세훈, 김영숙1, 추천호1, 나일채2, 이정훈2, 박권필†
  • 순천대학교 화학공학과, 57922 전남 순천시 매곡동 412
  • 1(주)ETIS, 10122 경기도 김포시 고천읍 풍곡리 431-1
  • 2(주)CNL Energy, 57922 전남 순천시 매곡동 412
Se-Hoon Lee, Young-Sook Kim1, Cheun-Ho Chu1, Il-Chai Na2, Jung-Hoon Lee2, and Kwon-Pil Park†
  • Department of Chemical Engineering, Sunchon National University, 412, Maegok-Dong, Suncheon, Jeonnam, 57922, Korea
  • 1ETIS Co, 431-1, Punggok-ri, Gochon-eup, Gimpo, Gyeonggi, 10122, Korea
  • 2CNL Energy Co, 412, Maegok-Dong, Suncheon, Jeonnam, 57922, Korea
E-mail:
초록
효소 전극 cathode와 PEMFC용 전극 anode를 이용하여 효소연료전지를 구동하였다. 효소 cathode는 그래파이트 분말과 효소로서 Laccase, 산화환원 매개체로서 ABTS를 혼합해 압축해서 만들고 Nafion 이오노머로 코팅하였다. cathode 제조조건을 변화시키며 OCV를 측정해 효소 cathode 제조 최적조건을 찾았다. 효소 cathode 압축 시 최적 압력은 4.0 bar 였다. 효소 cathode에서 그래파이트가 95%일 때 최고의 OCV를 나타냈다. cathode기질 용액의 최적 글루코스 농도는 0.4 mol/l이었다.
Enzyme fuel cells were composed of enzyme cathode and PEMFC anode. Enzyme cathode was fabricated by compression of a mixture of graphite particle, laccase as a enzyme and ABTS as a redox mediator, and then coated with Nafion ionomer. Open circuit voltage (OCV) were measured with variation of cathode manufacture factors, to find optimum condition of enzyme cathode. Optimum pressure was 4.0 bar for enzyme cathode pressing process. Highest OCV was obtained at 95% graphite composition in enzyme cathodee. Optimum glucose concentration was 0.4 mol/l in cathode substrate solution.
Keywords:Enzyme fuel cells;OCV;Pressing cathode;Fabrication method;Laccase
  1. Bruce EL, Bert H, Rene R, Uwe S, Jurg K, Stefano F, Peter A, Willy V, Korneel R, Environ. Sci. Technol., 40, 5181 (2006)
  2. Adam H, Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 6, 209 (2004)
  3. Mano N, Mao F, Heller A, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 125(21), 6588 (2003)
  4. Mano N, Mao F, Heller A, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124(44), 12962 (2002)
  5. Nicolas M, Fei M, Woonsup S, Ting C, Adam H, Chem. Commun., 518 (2003)
  6. Leech D, Kavanagh P, Schuhmann W, Electrochim. Acta, 84, 223 (2012)
  7. Bruce EL, “Microbial Fuel Cells,” Wiley-Interscience(2007).
  8. Kulys J, Vidziunaite R, Schneider P, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 32(3-4), 455 (2003)
  9. Noriko Y, Masamitsu T, Junko O, Satoshi I, Kazunori I, Koji S, Biosens. Bioelectron., 20, 2145 (2005)
  10. Zebda A, Gondran C, Le Goff A, Holzinger M, Nat. Commun., 2, 1 (2001)
  11. Milton RD, Giroud F, Thumser AE, Minteer SD, Slade RCT, Electrochim. Acta, 140, 59 (2014)
  12. Jenkins P, Tuurala S, Vaari A, Valkiainen M, Smolander M, Leech D, Enzyme Microb. Technol., 50(3), 181 (2012)
  13. Seiya T, Kenji K, Tokuji I, Electrochemistry, 70, 940 (2002)
  14. Fuyuki S, Makoto T, Mohammed KI, Tomokazu M, Junichi K, Noboru F, Satoshi K, Matsuhiko N, Electrochem. Commun., 7, 643 (2005)
  15. Kim H, Lee I, Kwon Y, Kim B, Ha S, Lee J, Kim J, Biosens. Bioelectron., 26, 3908 (2011)
  16. Cosnier S, Shan D, Ding SN, Electrochem. Commun., 12, 266 (2010)
  17. Abdelkader Z, Chantal G, Philippe C, Serge C, Sens. Actuators B-Chem., 173, 760 (2012)
  18. Luo HP, Jin S, Fallgren PH, Park HJ, Johnson PA, Chem. Eng. J., 165(2), 524 (2010)
  19. Kim YS, Lee SH, Chu CH, Na IC, Lee H, Park KP, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 53(1), 6 (2015)
  20. Lee H, Kim T, Sim W, Kim S, Ahn B, Lim T, Park K, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 28(2), 487 (2011)