Monomer topology has been implicated in domain-swapping, a potential first step on the route to disease causing protein aggregation. Despite having the same topology (beta 1-alpha 1-beta 2-beta 3-beta 4-beta 5), the cysteine protease inhibitor stefm-B domain swaps more readily than a single-chain variant of the heterodimeric sweet protein monellin (scMn). Here, we computationally study the folding of stefin-B and scMn in order to understand the molecular basis for the difference in their domain-swapping propensities. In agreement with experiments, our structure-based simulations show that scMn folds cooperatively without the population of an intermediate while stefin-B populates an equilibrium intermediate state. simulation intermediate has only one domain structured (beta 3-beta 4-beta 5), it can directly lead to domain-swapping. Using computational variants of stefin-B, we show that the population of this intermediate is caused by regions of stefin-B that have been implicated in protease inhibition. We also find that the protease-binding regions are located on two structural elements and localized in space. In contrast, the residues that contribute to the sweetness of monellin are not localized to a few structural elements but are distributed over the protein fold. We conclude that the distributed functional residues of monellin do not induce large local perturbations in the protein structure, eliminating the formation of folding intermediates and in turn domain swapping. On the other hand, the localized protease-binding regions of stefin-B promote the formation of a folding intermediate which can lead to domain-swapping. Thus, domain-swapping can be a direct consequence of the constraints that function imposes on the protein structure.