화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.35, No.4, 819-825, April, 2018
Fuzzy-based nonlinear PID controller and its application to CSTR
E-mail:
This study presents a new design method for a nonlinear variable-gain PID controller, the gains of which are described by a set of fuzzy rules. User-defined parameters are tuned using a genetic algorithm by minimizing the integral of absolute error and the weighted control input deviation index. It was observed in the experimental results on a continuous stirred tank reactor (CSTR) that the proposed controller provided performances: overshoot Mp≤1.25%, 2% settling time ts≤1.71 s and IAE≤1.26 for set-point tracking, perturbance peak Mpeak≤0.05%, 2% recovery time trcy≤ 3.97 s and IAE≤0.10 for disturbance rejection, and Mpeak≤0.04%, trcy≤2.74 s and IAE≤0.04 for parameter changes. Comparison with those of two other methods revealed that the proposed controller not only led to less overshoot and shorter settling time for set-point tracking and less perturbance peak and shorter recovery time for disturbance rejection, but also showed less sensitivity to parameter changes.
  1. Ray WH, Advanced Process Control, McGraw-Hill (1981).
  2. Bequette BW, Process Control: Modeling, Design and Simulation, Prentice Hall (2002).
  3. Smith CL, Practical Process Control: Tuning and Troubleshooting, Wiley (2009).
  4. Chen CT, Peng ST, Int. J. Process Control, 9, 151 (1999)
  5. Chang WD, Simulation Modelling Practice Theory, 31, 1 (2013)
  6. Dagher KA, Al-Araji AS, Al-Khwarizmi Eng. J., 9, 46 (2013)
  7. Sabir MM, Khan JA, Advances in Artificial Neural Systems, 2014 (2014).
  8. Pati AB, Chile RH, Wahane VR, Michael Faraday IET Int. Summit 2015: MFIIS-2015, 36 (2015).
  9. Zhuo Y, Zhu Q, 2015 7th Int. Conf. on Modelling, Identification and Control (2015).
  10. Rasul T, Pathak M, 1st IEEE Int. Conf. on Power Electronics, Intelligent Control and Energy Systems, 1 (2016).
  11. Saini P, Gaba SK, Rajput N, Aggarwal A, 2016 3rd Int. Conf. on Computing for Sustainable Global Development, 2778 (2016).
  12. Tamboli DA, Chile RH, 2016 Int. Conf. on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics, 1410 (2016).
  13. Seraji H, J. Robotics System, 15, 161 (1998)
  14. Su YX, Sun D, Duan BY, Mechatronics, 15, 1005 (2005)
  15. Li C, Wang S, Yue Z, Yu J, Wang H, Proc. of the 27th Chinese Conf. Control, 377 (2008).
  16. Zhang H, Hu B, Proc. Int. Conf. Future Electrical Power and Energy System, 202 (2012).
  17. Korkmaz M, Aydogdu O, Dogan H, Proc. Int. Symp. Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications, 1 (2012).
  18. Chen J, Lu B, Fan F, Zhu S, Jianxin W, Appl. Mech. Mater., 141, 157 (2012)
  19. Lucas R, Oliveira RM, Nascimento CB, Kaster MS, 2015 IEEE 24th Int. Symp. on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), 1022 (2015).
  20. Mishra P, Kumar V, Rana KPS, ISA Transactions, 58, 434 (2015)
  21. Astrom KJ, Hagglund T, PID Controllers: Theory, Design and Tuning, ISA (1995).
  22. O’Dwyer A, Handbook of PI and PID Controller Tuning Rules 3rd Ed., Imperial College Press (2009).
  23. Takagi T, Sugeno M, Fuzzy identification of systems and its applications to modeling and control, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.,15, 116 (1985).
  24. Isermann R, Digital Control Systems, Springer-Verlag, N. Y. (1977).
  25. Jin GG, Genetic Algorithms and Their Application, Kyo-Woo Publishing Co. (2000).
  26. Watanabe K, Hashem MMA, Evolutionary Computations:New Algorithms and their Applications to Evolutionary Robots, Springer (2004).