화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.35, No.8, 1626-1635, August, 2018
DOI10.1007/s11814-018-0076-y  Export Citation
Comparative kinetic study of coal gasification with steam and CO2 in molten blast furnace slags
Fan Yang, Qingbo Yu†, Huaqing Xie, Zongliang Zuo, Limin Hou, and Qin Qin
  • School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819, P. R. China
E-mail:
To make a comparison between coal gasification in molten blast furnace slag (MBFS) in different ambience and choose an appropriate agent to recover BF slag’s waste heat entirely, coal gasification with steam and CO2 in molten blast furnace slags was studied by isothermal thermo-gravimetric analysis. The effects of temperature and addition of MBFS were studied. Carbon conversion and reaction rate increased with increasing temperature and MBFS. Volumetric model (VM), shrinking core model (SCM), and diffusion model (DM) were applied to describe the coal gasification behavior of FX coal. The most appropriate model describing the coal gasification was SCM in steam ambience and VM in CO2 ambience, respectively. The reaction rate constant k(T) in CO2 ambience is greater than that in steam ambience, which means the gasification reactivity of coal in CO2 ambience is better than that in steam ambience. BF slag can effectively reduce the activation energy EA of coal gasification reaction in different ambiences. But, the difference of activation energies is not large in different ambiences. Based on the results of kinetic analysis including k(T) and EA calculated by the established model, CO2 was chosen to be the most appropriate agent.
Keywords:Coal Gasification;Molten Blast Furnace Slag;Heat Carrier;Kinetic Analysis;Isothermal Thermo-gravimetric
  1. Molina A, Mondragon F, Fuel, 77(15), 1831 (1998)
  2. Takarada T, Tamai Y, Tomita A, Fuel, 64, 1438 (1985)
  3. Maldonado-Hodar FJ, Rivera-Utrilla J, Mastral-Lamarca AM, Fuel, 74, 823 (1995)
  4. Feng B, Bhatia SK, Carbon, 41, 507 (2003)
  5. Niu Y, Wang S, Gong Y, Hui SE, Energy Procedia, 142, 1635 (2017)
  6. Zhu S, Bai Y, Luo K, Hao C, Bao W, Li F, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 128, 13 (2017)
  7. Sekine Y, Ishikawa K, Kikuchi E, Matsukata M, Energy Fuels, 19(1), 326 (2005)
  8. Sun QL, Li W, Chen HK, Li BQ, Fuel, 83(13), 1787 (2004)
  9. Xi J, Liang J, Sheng X, Shi L, Li S, J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis, 117, 228 (2016)
  10. Du RL, Wu K, Xu DA, Chao CY, Zhang L, Du XD, Fuel Process Technol., 148, 295 (2016)
  11. Niksa S, Heyd L, Russel W, Saville D, Symposium (International)on Combustion, Elsevier, 1445 (1985).
  12. Duan WJ, Yu QB, Zuo ZL, Qin Q, Li P, Liu JX, Energy Conv. Manag., 87, 185 (2014)
  13. Duan WJ, Yu QB, Xie HQ, Qin Q, Zuo ZL, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 39(22), 11611 (2014)
  14. Duan WJ, Yu QB, Xie HQ, Liu JX, Wang K, Qin Q, Han ZC, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 41(3), 1502 (2016)
  15. Duan WJ, Yu QB, Wang K, Qin Q, Hou LM, Yao X, Wu TW, Energy Conv. Manag., 100, 30 (2015)
  16. Li P, Yu QB, Qin Q, Lei W, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51(49), 15872 (2012)
  17. Li P, Yu QB, Xie HQ, Qin Q, Wang K, Energy Fuels, 27(8), 4810 (2013)
  18. Duan WJ, Yu QB, Wu TW, Yang F, Qin Q, Int. J. Hydrog. Energy, 41(42), 18995 (2016)
  19. Duan WJ, Yu QB, Liu JX, Wu TW, Yang F, Qin Q, Energy, 111, 859 (2016)
  20. Kasai E, Kitajima T, Akiyama T, Yagi J, Saito F, ISIJ Int., 37, 1031 (1997)
  21. Qin Y, Lv X, Bai C, Qiu G, Chen P, Jom-us., 64, 997 (2012)
  22. Zhang H, Wang H, Zhu X, Qiu YJ, Li K, Chen R, Liao Q, Appl. Energy, 112, 956 (2013)
  23. Barati M, Esfahani S, Utigard TA, Energy, 36(9), 5440 (2011)
  24. Sun Y, Zhang Z, Liu L, Wang X, Energies, 8, 1917 (2015)
  25. Li P, Qin Q, Yu QB, Du WY, Advanced Materials Research, Trans Tech Publ., 2347 (2010).
  26. Tanner J, Bhattacharya S, Chem. Eng. J., 285, 331 (2016)
  27. Wang Y, Bell DA, Fuel, 187, 94 (2017)
  28. Gomez A, Mahinpey N, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 95, 346 (2015)
  29. Jayaraman K, Gokalp I, Jeyakumar S, Appl. Therm. Eng., 110, 991 (2017)
  30. Zou JH, Zhou ZJ, Wang FC, Zhang W, Dai ZH, Liu HF, Yu ZH, Chem. Eng. Process., 46(7), 630 (2007)
  31. Silbermann R, Gomez A, Gates I, Mahinpey N, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 52(42), 14787 (2013)
  32. Bhatia SK, Perlmutter, AIChE J., 26, 379 (1980)
  33. Irfan MF, Usman MR, Kusakabe K, Energy, 36(1), 12 (2011)
  34. Jankovic B, Adnadevic B, Jovanovic J, Thermochim. Acta, 452(2), 106 (2007)
  35. Liu H, Luo CH, Kato S, Uemiya S, Kaneko M, Kojima T, Fuel Process. Technol., 87(9), 775 (2006)
  36. Liu H, Luo CH, Toyota M, Uemiya S, Kojima T, Fuel Process. Technol., 87(9), 769 (2006)
  37. Gao MQ, Yang ZR, Wang YL, Bai YH, Li F, Xie KC, Fuel, 189, 312 (2017)
  38. Sun Y, Nakano J, Liu L, Wang X, Zhang Z, Sci. Rep-uk., 5, 11436 (2015)
  39. Sun YQ, Zhang ZT, Liu LL, Wang XD, Bioresour. Technol., 181, 174 (2015)
  40. Kannan M, Richards G, Fuel, 69, 747 (1990)
  41. McKee DW, Carbon, 12, 453 (1974)
  42. Ren L, Yang J, Gao F, Yan J, Energy Fuels, 27, 5054 (2013)
  43. Liu H, Zhu H, Kaneko M, Kato S, Kojima T, Energy Fuels, 24, 68 (2010)
  44. Ye DP, Agnew JB, Zhang DK, Fuel, 77(11), 1209 (1998)
  45. Pande AR, Fuel, 71, 1299 (1992)