화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol.117, No.38, 9632-9637, 1995
Peptide Design - Structural Evaluation of Potential Nonhelical Segments Attached to Helical Modules
The conformations of three decapeptides containing a helical heptapeptide module attached to a potentially helix destabilizing tripeptide segment have been investigated in single crystals. X-ray diffraction studies of the sequence Boc-Gly-Dpg-Xxx-Val-Ala-Leu-Aib-Val-Ala-Leu-OMe (Xxx = Leu (1), Pro (2), and Ala (3); Dpg alpha,alpha-di-n-propylglycine; Aib = alpha-aminoisobutyric acid) reveal helical conformations for the segment 2-9 in all three peptides. In 1 and 2 Gly(1) is not accommodated in the right-handed helix and adopts a left-handed helical conformation with positive phi, psi values. The terminal blocking group extends away from the helix in 1 and 2. In 3 the helix is continuous, encompassing residues 1-9. The Dpg residues in all three cases adopt helical conformations, even when flanked by two helix destabilizing residues as in 2. These findings suggest that the higher alpha,alpha-dialkyl residues are good helix promoters although theoretical calculations suggest the existence of a pronounced energy minimum in fully extended regions of conformational space. None of the peptides pack efficiently. The register between helices in the head-to-tail region is not good, with disordered water molecules serving as hydrogen bond bridges and as space fillers. The crystallographic parameters follow. 1 : Xxx = Leu, C54H98N10O13. 2H(2)O . C3H7OH, P2(1)2(1)2(1), a = 16.399(3) Angstrom, b = 18.634(3) Angstrom, c = 23.241(4) Angstrom. 2 : Xxx = Pro, C53H94N10O13. xH(2)O, P2(1)2(1)2(1), a = 16.468(4) Angstrom, b = 18.071(4) Angstrom, c = 23.397(5) Angstrom. 3 : Xxx = Ala, C51H92N10O13. xH(2)O, P2(1)2(1)2, a = 19.289(7) Angstrom, b = 35.950(12) Angstrom, c = 9.570(3) Angstrom.