Journal of the American Chemical Society, Vol.118, No.5, 959-969, 1996
Design and Comprehensive Conformational Studies of Tyr(1)-Cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Phe(4)-L-3-Mpt(5)) and Tyr(1)-Cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Phe(4)-D-3-Mpt(5)) - Novel Conformationally Constrained Opioid-Peptides
Two compounds, Tyr(1)-cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Phe(4)-L-3-Mpt(5)) (DPMPT; 3-Mpt is trans-3-mercaptoproline) and Tyr(1)-cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Phe(4)-D-3-Mpt(5)) (DPDMPT), were designed employing energy calculations. Geometrical comparison showed that some low-energy 3D structures of DPMPT and DPDMPT are compatible with the model for the delta-receptor-bound conformation of the well-known delta-selective DPDPE peptide Tyr(1)-cyclo(D-Pen(2)-Gly(3)-Phe(4)-D-Pen(5), which was proposed by us earlier. DPMPT and DPDMPT were tested for their binding to delta-, mu- and kappa-opioid receptors. The corresponding K-i values were 3.5, 68, and >5000 nM for DPMPT, and 103.7, >5000, and >5000 nM for DPDMPT, respectively. Independent studies by homo- and heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy and energy calculations showed that DPMPT exists in DMSO solution in conformational equilibrium among several backbone conformations with the same type of 3D structure for the cyclic moiety, but with somewhat different conformers of the acyclic part of the molecule and two types of rotamers for the D-Pen side chain, namely, t and g(-). For DPDMPT, energy calculations combined with the NMR data suggest that any one out of four low-energy conformers belonging to the same type of the backbone of the cyclic moiety may be a possible candidate for the DPDMPT conformer in DMSO. The DPDMPT structure revealed by X-ray crystallography showed remarkable similarity to DPDMPT solution conformations. The determined solution conformations of both compounds were compared to their suggested delta-receptor-bound conformers. Results of comparison showed that all four of the possible solution conformations of DPDMPT are nonsimilar to the DPDMPT delta-receptor-bound conformation, whereas two of the possible solution conformations of DPMPT are compatible with the suggested delta-receptor-bound conformation of DPMPT. This finding can explain the difference in binding of DPMPT and DPDMPT to delta-opioid receptors by a suggestion that the delta-receptor-bound conformation of DPMPT already preexists in solution, whereas solution conformations of DPDMPT should be more significantly distorted to match the delta-receptor-bound conformation of DPDMPT.
Keywords:TOPOGRAPHICAL REQUIREMENTS;ENERGY MINIMIZATION;ENKEPHALIN ANALOGS;COUPLING-CONSTANTS;PROTEIN-STRUCTURE;DELTA-RECEPTOR;DISULFIDE BOND;ROTATING-FRAME;(D-PEN2;D-PEN5)ENKEPHALIN;SPECTROSCOPY