화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.31, No.3, 149-166, August, 2019
Predicting the excess pressure drop incurred by LPTT fluids in flow through a planar constricted channel
E-mail:
Laminar flow of a viscoelastic fluid obeying the linear simplified Phan-Thien/Tanner model (LPTT) is numerically studied in a planar channel partially obstructed by a cosinusoidal constriction. Based on published data (Tammadon-Jahromi et al., 2011) there is no excess pressure drop for this particular fluid when flowing through an orifice-plate. Numerical results obtained using OpenFoam software at a typically low Reynolds number suggest that there exists a strong competition between the fluid’s strain-hardening/shearthinning behavior on the one side with its first normal-stress difference in extension, on the other side, in controlling the pressure drop caused by the presence of the constriction. It is shown that, an excess-pressuredrop (epd) can correctly be predicted provided that use is made of a proper (inelastic) baseline in the definition of the “epd”. At moderate Reynolds numbers a flow-reversal is predicted to occur at the lee side of the constriction ruling out this technique as an extensional rheometer. It is argued that such vortices can be very useful in high-throughput microfluidic systems for mixing enhancement. To reduce the excessive pressure drop experienced by the fluid when working at high Reynolds numbers, it is shown that the Deborah number of the flow should be increased.
  1. Aguayo JP, Tamaddon-Jahromi HR, Webster MF, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 153(2-3), 157 (2008)
  2. Alves MA, Pinho FT, Oliveira PJ, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 101(1-3), 55 (2001)
  3. Anderson HI, Halden R, Glomsaker T, J. Biomech., 33, 1257 (2000)
  4. Azaiez J, Guenette R, AitKadi A, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 62(2-3), 253 (1996)
  5. Binding DM, Phillips PM, Phillips TN, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 137(1-3), 31 (2006)
  6. Bird RB, Armstrong RC, Hassager O, Dynamics of Polymeric Liquids Vol. 1: Fluid Mechanics, 1987.
  7. Cheng RTS, Phys. Fluids, 15, 2098 (1972)
  8. Cogswell FN, Polym. Eng. Sci., 12, 64 (1972)
  9. Favero JL, Secchi AR, Cardozo NSM, Jasak H, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 165(23-24), 1625 (2010)
  10. Fernandes C, Vukcevic V, Uroic T, Simoes R, Carneiro OS, Jasak H, Nobrega JM, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 265, 99 (2019)
  11. Giddens DP, Zarins CK, Glagov S, J. Biomech. Eng. -Trans. ASME, 115, 588 (1993)
  12. Grillet AM, Bogaerds ACB, Peters GWM, Baaijens FPT, J. Rheol., 46(3), 651 (2002)
  13. Harten A, J. Comput. Phys., 49, 357 (1983)
  14. James DF, Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech., 41, 129 (2009)
  15. James DF, Chandler GM, Armor SJ, J. Non-Newton. Fluid Mech., 35, 421 (1990)
  16. Larson RG, Constitutive Equations for Polymer Melts and Solutions,1988.
  17. Lee HS, Muller SJ, J. Rheol., 61(5), 1049 (2017)
  18. Lee JW, Kim D, Kwon Y, Rheol. Acta, 41(3), 223 (2002)
  19. Lopez-Aguilar JE, Webster MF, Tamaddon-Jahromi HR, Manero O, Binding DM, Walters K, Phys. Fluids, 29, 121613 (2017)
  20. Magda JJ, Lou J, Baek SG, DeVries KL, Polymer, 32, 2000 (1991)