The size and complexity of chemical kinetic models used to simulate combustion of hydrocarbon fuels continue to increase with our improved understanding of the underlying physical mechanisms, along with the improved ability to utilize such models as the result of increased computational power and efficiency. As mechanisms grow beyond thousands of species and tens of thousands of reactions, it becomes increasingly difficult to manually check for errors and physical inconsistencies. We present several automated methods to check for such issues in the specification of chemical reaction models. First, we demonstrate how discontinuities in thermodynamic data can cause simulation difficulties manifested as long wall-clock times and convergence failures. To correct this type of problem, we describe an automated method for refitting thermodynamic parameters. We also outline several methods to check the timescales of reaction rate coefficients to ensure physical consistency. All the methods are made available through a web-based tool (https://combustiontools.llnl.gov) intended to aid mechanism developers and users to improve the accuracy and performance of fuel models used by the combustion community. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of The Combustion Institute.