화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.38, No.7, 1416-1424, July, 2021
DOI10.1007/s11814-021-0782-8  Export Citation
Evaluation of peroxymonosulfate/O3/UV process on a real polluted water with landfill leachate: Feasibility and comparative study
Farshid Ghanbari1, †, Masoumeh Khatebasreh2, Mostafa Mahdavianpour1, Ali Mashayekh-Salehi3, Ehsan Aghayani1, Kun-Yi Andrew Lin4, †, and Behnam Kazemi Noredinvand5, 6
  • 1Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Abadan Faculty of Medical Sciences, Abadan, Iran
  • 2Environmental Science and Technology Research Center, Department of Environmental Health Engineering, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran
  • 3Department of Environmental Health Engineering, School of Public Health, Shahroud University of Medical Sciences, Shahroud, Iran
  • 4Department of Environmental Engineering & Innovation and Development Center of Sustainable Agriculture & Research Center of Sustainable Energy and Nanotechnology, National Chung Hsing University, 250, Kuo-Kuang Road, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 5Department of Environmental Engineering, Ahvaz Branch, Islamic Azad University, Ahvaz, Iran
  • 6Department of Environmental Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
E-mail:,
Landfill leachate is classified as special wastewater because it contains a large amount of hazardous materials that can lead to the pollution of surface water, generating polluted water with landfill leachate (PWLL) with high organic load. This study investigated the treatment of PWLL by peroxymonosulfate (PMS)/O3/UV process. The effects of several operating parameters such as pH, reaction time, O3 and PMS dosage were investigated in detail. The results showed that PMS/O3/UV removed total organic carbon (TOC) (74%), color (98%), ammonia (93%), chemical oxygen demand (COD) (81%), and biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) (69%) in 75 min at optimal conditions (pH=7, PMS=5mM, O3=1.7 mg/min). According to the results, O3 and UV can well activate PMS and promote the ability of the process to remove TOC from PWLL. Adding ferrous ion to PMS/O3/UV increased the TOC removal efficiency (77%), but cobalt ions had no significant effect on the TOC removal. The elimination of TOC by the PMS/O3/UV process follows pseudo-first-order kinetic model with the reaction rate constant of 0.0203 min?1. Compared to peroxone/ UV, PMS/O3/UV showed high yield in TOC, COD, color and ammonia removal. Thus the PMS/O3/UV process can be a new approach for treatment of polluted water in low volume.
Keywords:Peroxymonosulfate;Landfill Leachate;Water Pollution;Ozone;UV Irradiation;Peroxone
  1. Scott M, Millar GJ, Altaee A, J. Water Proc. Eng., 31, 100806 (2019)
  2. Daud MK, Nafees M, Ali S, Rizwan M, Bajwa RA, et al., BioMed Res. Int., 2017, 790818 (2017)
  3. Jiang Y, Li R, Yang Y, Yu M, Xi B, Li M, Xu Z, Gao S, Yang C, Resour. Conserv. Recycl., 151, 104463 (2019)
  4. Chen W, Wang F, He C, Li Q, J. Hazard. Mater., 397, 122785 (2020)
  5. Guo S, Wang Q, Luo c, Yao J, Qiu Z, Li Q, Chemosphere, 243, 125390 (2020)
  6. Kulikowska D, Klimiuk E, Bioresour. Technol., 99(13), 5981 (2008)
  7. El-Salam MMA, Abu-Zuid GI, J. Adv. Res., 6, 579 (2015)
  8. Sharma A, Ganguly R, Gupta AK, J. Environ. Eng., 146, 050190 (2020)
  9. Mandal P, Dubey BK, Gupta AK, Waste Manage., 69, 250 (2017)
  10. Cortez S, Teixeira P, Oliveira R, Mota M, J. Hazard. Mater., 182(1-3), 730 (2010)
  11. Zhang H, Wang Z, Liu CC, Guo YZ, Shan N, Meng CX, Sun LY, Chem. Eng. J., 250, 76 (2014)
  12. Wang JL, Wang SZ, Chem. Eng. J., 334, 1502 (2018)
  13. Giannakis S, Lin KYA, Ghanbari F, Chem. Eng. J., 406, 127083 (2021)
  14. Huang YH, Huang YF, Huang CI, Chen CY, J. Hazard. Mater., 170(2-3), 1110 (2009)
  15. Chen JB, Zhang LM, Huang TY, Li WW, Wang Y, Wang ZM, J. Hazard. Mater., 320, 571 (2016)
  16. Ghanbari F, Khatebasreh M, Mahdavianpour M, Lin KYA, Chemosphere, 244, 125326 (2020)
  17. Ghanbari F, Wu J, Khatebasreh M, Ding D, Lin KYA, Sep. Purif. Technol., 242, 116828 (2020)
  18. Jiang F, Qiu B, Sun DZ, Chem. Eng. J., 349, 338 (2018)
  19. Wu JJ, Wu CC, Ma HW, Chang CC, Chemosphere, 54, 997 (2004)
  20. Chegini ZG, Hassani H, Torabian A, Borghei SM, Pigm. Resin Technol., 49, 409 (2020)
  21. Yu X, Qin W, Yuan X, Sun L, Pan F, Xia D, J. Hazard. Mater., 407, 124393 (2021)
  22. Martinez-Huitle CA, Panizza M, Curr. Opin. Electrochem., 11, 62 (2018)
  23. He X, Mezyk SP, Michael I, Fatta-Kassinos D, Dionysiou DD, J. Hazard. Mater., 279, 375 (2014)
  24. Hayon E, Treinin A, Wilf J, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 94, 47 (1972)
  25. Ball DL, Edwards JO, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 78, 1125 (1956)
  26. Yu X, Qin W, Yuan X, Sun L, Pan F, Xia D, J. Hazard. Mater., 407, 124393 (2021)
  27. Oh WD, Dong ZL, Lim TT, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 194, 169 (2016)
  28. Fernandez J, Maruthamuthu P, Renken A, Kiwi J, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 49(3), 207 (2004)
  29. Olmez-Hanci T, Arslan-Alaton I, Chem. Eng. J., 224, 10 (2013)
  30. Lee H, Lim J, Zhan M, Hong S, Desalination, 467, 219 (2019)
  31. Ghanbari F, Ahmadi M, Gohari F, Sep. Purif. Technol., 228, 115732 (2019)
  32. Guo L, Zhong Q, Ding J, Ou M, Lv Z, Song F, Ozone: Sci. Eng., 38, 382 (2016)
  33. Maol Y, Dong H, Liu S, Zhang L, Qiang Z, Water Res., 173, 115615 (2020)
  34. Lu T, Chen Y, Liu M, Jiang W, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 121, 175 (2019)
  35. Zhang Yiqing, Zhang Jiefeng, Xiao Yongjun, Chang Victor W. C., Lim Teik-Thye, Chem. Eng. J., 302, 526 (2016)
  36. Nikravesh B, Shomalnasab A, Nayyer A, Aghababaei N, Zarebi R, Ghanbari F, J. Environ. Chem. Eng., 8, 104244 (2020)
  37. Chou MS, Chang KL, Ozone: Sci. Eng., 29, 391 (2007)
  38. Sharma J, Mishra IM, Dionysiou DD, Kumar V, Chem. Eng. J., 276, 193 (2015)
  39. Yu KP, Lee GWM, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 75(1-2), 29 (2007)
  40. Liu GF, Li XC, Han BJ, Chen LW, Zhu LN, Campos LC, J. Hazard. Mater., 322, 461 (2017)
  41. Zeng XL, Chen J, Qu RJ, Feng MB, Wang ZY, Chem. Eng. J., 319, 98 (2017)
  42. Gruttadauria A, Liotta LF, Di Carlo G, Pantaleo G, Deganello G, Lo Meo P, Aprile C, Noto R, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 75(3-4), 281 (2007)
  43. Piera E, Calpe JC, Brillas E, Domenech X, Peral J, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 27(3), 169 (2000)
  44. Clarizia L, Russo D, Di Somma I, Marotta R, Andreozzi R, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 209, 358 (2017)
  45. Kim YB, Ahn JH, J. Environ. Eng., 142, 040150 (2016)
  46. Abu Amr SS, Aziz HA, Adlan MN, Waste Manage., 33, 1434 (2013)
  47. Deng Y, Ezyske CM, Water Res., 45, 6189 (2011)
  48. Deng Y, Int. J. Environ. Waste Manage., 4, 366 (2009)
  49. Li ZX, Yuan S, Qiu CC, Wang YJ, Pan XJ, Wang JL, Wang CW, Zuo JA, Electrochim. Acta, 102, 174 (2013)
  50. Venu D, Gandhimathi R, Nidheesh PV, Ramesh ST, Sep. Purif. Technol., 129, 64 (2014)
  51. Dantas ERB, Silva EJ, Lopes WS, do Nascimento MR, Leite VD, de Sousa JT, Environ. Technol., 41, 2637 (2020)
  52. Genc N, Durna E, J. Microwave. Power EE., 53, 155 (2019)
  53. Azadi S, Karimi-Jashni A, Javadpour S, Amiri H, J. Water Proc. Eng., 36, 101307 (2020)
  54. Zarghi MH, Jaafarzadeh N, Roudbari A, Zahedi A, Water Sci. Technol., 81, 358 (2020)