화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Applied Chemistry for Engineering, Vol.32, No.4, 393-402, August, 2021
DOI10.14478/ace.2021.1042  Export Citation
CO2/N2 분리를 위한 Pebax 혼합막에서 Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-7의 영향
Effect of Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework-7 in Pebax Mixed Matrix Membrane for CO2/N2 Separation
윤숭석, 홍세령1, †
  • 상명대학교 화공신소재학과
  • 1상명대학교 계당교양교육원
Soong Seok Yoon, and Se Ryeong Hong1, †
  • Department of Chemical Engineering and Materials Science, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea
  • 1Kyedang College of General Educations, Sangmyung University, Seoul 03016, Korea
E-mail:
초록
본 연구는 대표적 poly(ether-b-amide)인 Pebax-1657과 Pebax-2533에 합성된 zeolitic imidazolate framework-7 (ZIF-7)을 넣어 혼합막을 제조하고, 단일기체 N2, CO2에 대한 투과 성질을 조사하였다. 기체투과 결과에서, N2의 경우 Pebax-1657/ZIF-7 혼합막과 Pebax-2533/ZIF-7 혼합막 모두 ZIF-7 혼입에 따라 투과도가 감소하는 비슷한 현상을 보였지만, CO2 투과도의 경우는 고분자에 종류에 따라 조금 다른 경향을 보였다. Pebax-1657/ZIF-7 혼합막의 경우는 ZIF-7의 0~3 wt% 함량 범위에서 CO2 투과도가 감소하다가 그 이후 함량에서 투과도가 증가하였고, Pebax-2533/ZIF-7 혼합막의 경우는 ZIF-7의 0~5 wt% 함량 범위에서 CO2 투과도 증가 없이 감소하였다. CO2/N2 선택도의 경우 두 혼합막 모두 ZIF-7의 함량이 많아짐에 따라 증가하는 경향을 보였으며, 특히 Pebax-2533/ZIF-7 5 wt%은 다른 혼합막들에 비해 가장 좋은 투과 성능을 보였다. 이는 ZIF-7이 Pebax-1657보다 Pebax-2533에 더 좋은 호환성을 보이며 CO2에 대한 선택적인 특성이 잘 나타났기 때문으로 생각된다.
In this study, a mixed matrix membrane was prepared by putting the zeolitic imidazolate framework-7 (ZIF-7) synthesized in Pebax-1657 and Pebax-2533, which are representative poly(ether-b-amide), and the permeability properties of single gas such as N2 and CO2 were investigated. From the gas permeation results, in the case of N2, both the Pebax-1657/ZIF-7 and Pebax-2533/ZIF-7 mixed matrix membranes showed a similar phenomenon in which the permeability decreased with the incorporation of ZIF-7. For CO2 permeability, the tendency was slightly different depending on the type of polymer. In the Pebax-1657/ZIF-7 mixed membrane, the CO2 permeability decreased in the range of 0~3 wt% of ZIF-7, and increased at higher contents. The CO2 permeability of the Pebax-2533/ZIF-7 mixed matrix membrane gradually decreased without increasing the permeability in the range of 0~5 wt% of ZIF-7. Regarding CO2/N2 selectivity, both mixed films showed a tendency to increase with increasing the ZIF-7 content. In particular, Pebax-2533/ZIF-7 5 wt% showed the best gas permeation performance compared to other mixed matrix membrane. This is thought to be because ZIF-7 shows better compatibility with Pebax-2533 than that of Pebax-1657 and also better CO2 selective property.
Keywords:Pebax-1657;Pebax-2533;ZIF-7;CO2 separation
  1. Nafisi V, Hagg MB, J. Membr. Sci., 459, 244 (2014)
  2. Murali RS, Ismail AF, Rahman MA, Sridhar S, Sep. Purif. Technol., 129, 1 (2014)
  3. Azizi N, Hojjati MR, Petrol. Sci. Technol., 36, 993 (2018)
  4. Khoshkharam A, Azizi N, Behbahani RM, Ghayyem MA, Petrol. Sci. Technol., 35, 667 (2017)
  5. Kim J, Park T, Chung E, J. Membr. Sci. Res., 7, 74 (2021)
  6. Selyanchyn R, Ariyoshi M, Fujikawa S, Membranes, 8, 121 (2018)
  7. Meshkat S, Kaliaguine S, Rodrigue D, Sep. Purif. Technol., 235, 116150 (2020)
  8. Dai Z, Bai L, Hval KN, Zhang X, Zhang S, Deng L, Sci. China Chem., 59, 538 (2016)
  9. Casadei R, Baschetti MG, Yoo MJ, Park HB, Giorgini L, Membranes, 10, 188 (2020)
  10. Gao J, Mao H, Jin H, Chen C, Feldhoff A, Li Y, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 297, 110030 (2020)
  11. Fam W, Mansouri J, Li HY, Chen V, J. Membr. Sci., 537, 54 (2017)
  12. Akhtar FH, Kumar M, Peinemann KV, J. Membr. Sci., 525, 187 (2017)
  13. Bernardo P, Clarizia G, Polymers, 12, 253 (2020)
  14. Park HB, Kamcev J, Robeson LM, Elimelech M, Freeman BD, Science, 356, eaa053 (2017)
  15. Vinoba M, Bhagiyalakshmi M, Alqaheem Y, Alomair AA, Perez A, Rana MS, Sep. Sci. Technol., 188, 431 (2017)
  16. Shin JE, Han SH, Ha SY, Park HB, KIC News, 21, 2 (2018)
  17. Ahmadi M, Janakiram S, Dai Z, Ansaloni L, Deng L, Membranes, 8, 50 (2018)
  18. Zhao P, Lampronti GI, Lloyd GO, Suard E, Redfern SA, J. Mater. Chem. A, 2, 620 (2014)
  19. Arami-Niya A, Birkett G, Zhu Z, Rufford TE, J. Mater. Chem. A, 5, 21389 (2017)
  20. Li T, Pan YC, Peinemann KV, Lai ZP, J. Membr. Sci., 425, 235 (2013)
  21. Chakrabarty T, Neelakanda P, Peinemann K, J. Mater. Sci. Res., 7, 1 (2018)
  22. Al-Maythalony BA, Alloush AM, Faizan M, Dafallah H, et al., ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 9, 33401 (2017)
  23. Yeom CK, Lee JM, Hong YT, Kim SC, Membr. J., 9, 141 (1999)
  24. Ebrahimi M, Mansournia M, Mater. Lett., 189, 243 (2017)
  25. Ebrahimi A, Mansournia M, Chem. Phys., 511, 33 (2018)
  26. Park KS, Ni Z, Cote AP, Choi JY, Huang R, Uribe-Romo FJ, Chae HK, O'Keeffe M, Yaghi OM, PNAS, 103, 10186 (2006)
  27. Kang CH, Lin YF, Huang YS, Tung KL, Chang KS, Chen JT, Hung WS, Lee KR, Lai JY, J. Membr. Sci., 438, 105 (2013)
  28. Cai WX, Lee T, Lee M, Cho W, Han DY, Choi N, Yip ACK, Choi J, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136(22), 7961 (2014)
  29. Wu X, Shahrak MN, Yuan B, Deng S, Microporous Mesoporous Mater., 190, 189 (2014)
  30. Zhao D, Ren JZ, Wang Y, Qiu YT, Li H, Hua KS, Li XX, Ji JM, Deng MC, J. Membr. Sci., 521, 104 (2017)
  31. Deng J, Dai ZD, Deng LY, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 59(32), 14458 (2020)
  32. Knozowska K, Li G, Kujawski W, Kujawa J, J. Membr. Sci., 599, 117814 (2020)
  33. Mosleh S, Khanbabaei G, Mozdianfard M, Hemmati M, Iran. Polym. J., 25, 977 (2016)
  34. Jeong S, Sohn H, Kang SW, Chem. Eng. J., 333, 276 (2018)
  35. Pazani F, Aroujalian A, Polym. Test., 81, 106264 (2020)
  36. Xiang L, Liu D, Jin H, Xu L, Wang C, Xu S, Pan Y, Li Y, Mater. Horiz., 7, 223 (2020)
  37. Pazirofteh M, Dehghani M, Niazi S, Mohammadi AH, Asghari M, J. Mol. Liq., 241, 646 (2017)
  38. Shin JE, Lee SK, Cho YH, Park HB, J. Membr. Sci., 572, 300 (2019)
  39. Li H, Lv W, Xu J, Hu J, Liu H, J. Membr. Sci., 614, 118426 (2020)
  40. Shi GM, Chen HM, Jean YC, Chung TS, Polymer, 54(2), 774 (2013)
  41. Wang S, Huang Z, Ru X, Wang J, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 138(27), 50641 (2021)
  42. Bernardo P, Jansen JC, Bazzarelli F, Tasselli F, Fuoco A, Friess K, Izak P, Jarmarova V, Kacirkova M, Clarizia G, Sep. Purif. Technol., 97, 73 (2012)
  43. Murali RS, Sridhar S, Sankarshana T, Ravikumar YVL, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 49(14), 6530 (2010)
  44. Zhang L, Hu Z, Jiang J, J. Phys. Chem. C, 116, 19268 (2012)
  45. Noguera-D?az A, Villarroel-Rocha J, Ting VP, Bimbo N, Sapag K, Mays TJ, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 94(12), 3787 (2019)
  46. Hwang SW, Chung YC, Chun BC, Lee SJ, Polym. Korea, 28(5), 374 (2004)
  47. Xie K, Fu Q, Qiao GG, Webley PA, J. Membr. Sci., 572, 38 (2019)
  48. Kim H, Korean Chem. Eng. Res., 49(4), 460 (2011)
  49. Bondar VI, Freeman BD, Pinnau I, J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys., 38(15), 2051 (2000)
  50. Robeson LM, J. Membr. Sci., 320(1-2), 390 (2008)