화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.39, No.4, 963-972, April, 2022
DOI10.1007/s11814-021-0999-6  Export Citation
Influence of degree of compaction on electrokinetic remediation of unsaturated soil
Chengwei Yin, Liguo Jiang†, Keming Sun, Weiji Sun, and Bing Liang
  • School of Mechanics & Engineering, Liaoning Technical University, Fuxin, Liaoning Province, 123000, China
E-mail:
In order to evaluate the electrokinetic process for unsaturated soil with different compacted conditions, six remolded soil samples containing the same water content (16 wt%) were compressed to obtain the various degrees of compaction (96.87% to 103.37%). All the lab-scale experiments were performed by applying a constant electrical voltage (1 V/cm). The electrical parameters related to the electrokinetic process were monitored to evaluate the influence of the soil degree of compaction on this process. The obtained results indicate that the soil compaction degree could influence the electrical current, the migration velocity of the voltage front, and the controlling mechanism of water transport during the electrokinetic processes. Followed by the initial decline, the electrical current of soil with a lower degree of compaction (96.87%) would increase at 0.7mA/h, which was about seven times larger than that of the soil with a higher degree of compaction (103.37%). The migration velocity of voltage front in the soils increased with decreasing compaction degree. The voltage front migrated from the cathode towards the anode at 6.66 mm/h in the soil with a lower degree of compaction (96.87%). In comparison, the migration velocity decreased to 1.75 mm/h in the soil with a higher degree of compaction (103.37%). Both hydraulic and electrokinetic driving forces could influence the water transport in unsaturated soil. The results demonstrate that the catholyte entering the soil under the hydraulic gradient could be opposite to electro-osmosis. The electrokinetic driving force would be a major controlling mechanism for the unsaturated soil with a higher degree of compaction. For the soil with a lower degree of compaction, the hydraulic driving force would affect the water transport in the soil during its initial saturation period. Moreover, with the increase in soil saturation, the effects of hydraulic driving force were weakened, and the electrochemical properties of the pore solution appeared to be the dominant factor for the electrokinetic process.
Keywords:Electrokinetic Remediation;Unsaturated Soil;Degree of Compaction;Apparent Electrical Conductivity
  1. Reddy KR, Saichek RE, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 129, 336 (2003)
  2. Sivapullaiah PV, Prakash BSN, J. Hazard. Mater., 143, 682 (2007)
  3. Ryu BG, Park SW, Baek K, Yang JS, Sep. Sci. Technol., 44, 2421 (2009)
  4. Reddy KR, Cameselle C, Ala P, J. Appl. Electrochem., 40, 1269 (2010)
  5. Tamagnini C, Jommi C, Cattaneo F, An. Acad Bras Cienc., 82, 169 (2010)
  6. Razaee M, Asadollahfardi G, Environ. Model. Assess., 24, 235 (2019)
  7. Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshawabkeh AN, Marks RE, Puppala S, Bricka M, Parker R, J. Hazard. Mater., 40, 117 (1995)
  8. Yeung AT, Hsu C, Menon RM, J. Hazard. Mater., 55, 221 (1997)
  9. Yeung AT, Hsu C, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 131, 298 (2005)
  10. Gill T, Harbottle MJ, Smith JWN, Thornton SF, Chemosphere, 107, 31 (2014)
  11. Lόpez-Vizcaíno R, Risco C, Isidro J, Rodrigo S, Saez C, Pañizares P, Navarro V, Rodrigo MA, Chemosphere, 166, 540 (2017)
  12. Lόpez-Vizcaíno R, Risco C, Isidro J, Rodrigo S, Saez C, Pañizares P, Navarro V, Rodrigo MA, Chemosphere, 166, 549 (2017)
  13. Vocciante M, Caretta A, Bua L, Bagatin R, Ferro S, Chem. Eng. J., 289, 123 (2016)
  14. Liu Y, Zheng L, Rao S, Adv. Mater. Sci. Eng., 2021, 6642785 (2021)
  15. Li X, Wang L, Sun X, Cong Y, Front. Struct. Civ. Eng., 13, 1463 (2019)
  16. Cox CD, Shoesmith MA, Ghosh MM, Environ. Sci. Technol., 30, 1933 (1996)
  17. Saini A, Bekele DN, Chadalavada S, Fang C, Naidu R, Environ. Technol. Inno., 23, 101585 (2021)
  18. Lu Q, Chemosphere, 254, 126861 (2020)
  19. Ghobadi R, Altaee A, Zhou JL, Karbassiyazdi E, Ganbat N, Sci. Total Environ., 794, 148668 (2021)
  20. Sun R, Gong W, Chen Y, Hong J, Wang Y, Process Saf. Environ. Protect., 153, 117 (2021)
  21. ASTM D4186/D4186M-20e1 (2020). Standard Test Method for One-Dimensional Consolidation Properties of Saturated Cohesive Soils Using Controlled-Strain Loading. ASTM International West Conshohocken, PA.
  22. ASTM D698-12 (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction of Soil Standard Effort (12,400 ft-lbf/ft3 (600 kN-m/ m3)). ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  23. ASTM D1557-12 (2021). Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Modified Effort (56,000 ft-lbf/ft3 (2,700kN-m/m3)), ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  24. Kowalczyk S, Maślakowski M, Tucholka P, J. Appl. Geophys, 110, 43 (2014)
  25. Lipiec J, Hajnos M, Świeboda R, Geoderma, 179-180, 20 (2012)
  26. Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 2638 (1993)
  27. Tang K, Zhang F, Feng D, Lu X, Eng. Geol., 294, 106404 (2021)
  28. Yustres A, Lόpez-Vizcaíno R, Cabrera V, Navarro V, E3S Web of Conferences, 195, 02003 (2020).
  29. Mattson ED, Bowman RS, Lindgren ER, J. Contam. Hydrol., 54, 99 (2002)
  30. Yustres A, López-Vizcaíno R, Sáez C, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA, Navarro V, Sep. Purif. Technol., 192, 196 (2018)
  31. Xie XY, Liu YM, Zheng LW, 2018. Mar. Georesour. Geotec., 37, 1188 (2019)
  32. ASTM D4318-17e1 (2017). Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit, and Plasticity Index of Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  33. ASTM D854-14 (2014). Standard Test Methods for Specific Gravity of Soil Solids by Water Pycnometer, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  34. ASTM D7503-18 (2018). Standard Test Method for Measuring the Exchange Complex and Cation Exchange Capacity of Inorganic Fine-Grained Soils, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  35. Huweg AF, Ph.D Thesis, University of Southern Queensland, Queensland (2013).
  36. ASTM G57-06 (2012). Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Soil Resistivity Using the Wenner Four-Electrode Method. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA.
  37. Yeung AT, Hsu C, Menon RM, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 122, 666 (1996)
  38. Al-Hamdan AZ, Reddy KR, Chemosphere, 71, 860 (2008)
  39. Hsu C, Yeung AT, Menon RM, Environ. Syst. Decis., 31, 33 (2011)
  40. Reddy KR, Chinthamreddy S, Waste Manage., 19, 269 (1999)
  41. Reddy KR, Darko-Kagya K, Al-Hamdan AZ, Water Air Soil Pollut., 221, 35 (2011)
  42. Roodposhti HR, Hafizi MK, Kermani MRS, Nik MRG, J. Appl. Geophys., 168, 49 (2019)
  43. Gabrieli L, Jommi C, Musso G, Romero E, J. Appl. Electrochem., 38, 1043 (2008)
  44. Shin SY, Park SM, Baek K, Water Air Soil Pollut., 227, 223 (2016)
  45. Sauer MC, Southwick PE, Spiegler KS, Wylie MRJ, Ind. Eng. Chem., 47, 2187 (1955)
  46. Rhoades JD, Manteghi NA, Shouse PJ, Alves WJ, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 53, 433 (1989)
  47. Reddy KR, Maturi K, In 16th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Osaka, Japan, Millpress Science Publishers, Rotterdam, Netherlands, 2429-2432 (2005).
  48. Friedman SP, Comput. Electron. Agric., 46, 45 (2005)
  49. Samouëlian A, Cousin I, Tabbagh A, Bruand A, Richard G, Soil Till. Res., 83, 173 (2005)
  50. Niwas S, Tezkan B, Israil M, Hydrogeol. J., 19, 307 (2011)
  51. Archie GE, Transactions of the AIME, 146, 54 (1942)
  52. Friedman SP, Comput. Electron. Agr., 46, 45 (2005)
  53. Shackelford CD, Daniel DE, J. Geotech. Geoenviron., 117, 467 (1991)
  54. Alshawabkeh AN, Acar YB, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A-Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 27, 1835 (1992)
  55. Wieczorek S, Weigand H, Schmid M, Marb C, Eng. Geol., 77, 203 (2005)