Two orienting techniques for stiffening semicrystalline polymers, rolling and die-drawing, are compared with respect to the anisotropy they produce in isotactic polypropylene (PP). Billets of PP were either drawn at 145 degrees C through a tapered slotted die in the Leeds large-scale die-drawing machine to reduction ratios R of 2.2, 5.1 and 7.6, or rolled between rolls of 65 mm diameter at 120 degrees C to R = 2 to 5. Drawing increased the crystallinity, as estimated from differential scanning calorimetry, density and wide-angle X-ray diffraction (WAXD); it thus disrupts the original PP structure, developing an oriented crystalline structure. WAXD pole figures showed that both die-drawing and rolling oriented the molecular chain axis nearly parallel to the-machine direction and the b axis perpendicular to the drawing plane. This approximate uniaxial symmmetry was confirmed by ultrasonic measurements of the stiffness matrix, in tensile and falling-dart impact tests, samples failed by delaminating in the drawing plane. Although stresses are applied to the material in quite different ways in die-drawing and in rolling, the geometry of deformation in both is similar, close to plane strain.