화학공학소재연구정보센터
HWAHAK KONGHAK, Vol.39, No.5, 600-606, October, 2001
폐수처리용 페타이어 담체의 제조 및 특성
Preparation and Characteristics of Media from Waste Tire Powder for Waste Water Treatment
E-mail:
초록
페타이어 재활용을 위하여 유동상 폐수처리용 폐타이어 담체를 제조할 수 있는 최적공정 조건을 제조된 폐타이어 담체의 물성 분석을 통하여 구축하였다. 페타이어 담체의 제조에 있어서 투입되는 폐타이어와 EVA(ethyl vinyl acetate)바인더의 적정조성(w/w)은 약 4대 1이었고 공극률은 0.74이었다. 이렇게 제조된 폐타이어 담체에 여러 가지 흡착제를 도포하여 미생물을 이용한 폐수처리공정에 적용하였을 때에 온도 및 C/N비의 변화에 따른 5가지 mode의 운전조건 하에서 각각의 폐타이어 담체에 대한 암모니움 이온의 제거율을 평가하고 상호간에 비교하였다. 20℃에서 암모니움 이온의 제거율은 담체의 종류에 무관하였고 10℃에서는 코코넛 또는 석탄재료의 활성탄을 도포한 담체가 합성 칼슘 실리케이트를 도포한 경우보다 약 1.5배 이상의 높은 암모니움 이온의 제거율을 나타내었다.
For recycling waste-tires the process conditions to prepare the media of waste-tire-powder for the fluidized treatment of waste-water were optimized by the analysis of their physical properties. The optimum ratio(w/w) of waste-tire-powder to EVA(ethyl vinyl acetate) binder to prepare waste-tire-powder media turned out to be 4 to 1 and their porosity was 0.74. Various adsorbents were applied to the surface of the prepared media, after which they were used in the treatment of waste-water so that their removal rates of ammonium ion were evaluated under 5 modes of different operating conditions such as temperature and C/N ratios and were compared each other. At 20 ℃ the ammonium ion removal rates of 5 modes were similar regardless of adsorbents applied to the surface of the prepared media. In the meantime, at 10 ℃ the ammonium ion removal rates of the media with coconut- or coal-based activated carbon were shown to be higher by more than 1.5 times than those of the media with synthetic calcium silicate.
  1. Korea Resources Recovery and Reutilization Cooperation, "Waste Recycling Statistics(II): the Current Status on the Generation of Waste Tire and Its Recycling," (1999)
  2. Choung YK, KOSEF Report, 853-1304-004-1 (1985)
  3. Lee TJ, Kweon OY, An SJ, J. KSEE, 22, 16101 (2000)
  4. Stanley JT, "Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology,", 3, 1842 (1989)
  5. Park JW, Roh HS, Kim JK, Joe YI, J. Korea Inst. Rubber Ind., 32, 325 (1997)
  6. Japan Water Works Association, "Sewage Analysis Method I," (1997)
  7. Sharma B, Ahlert RC, Water Res., 11, 897 (1977) 
  8. Kim YH, Cho JH, Kim MH, Lee YW, J. KSEE, 19, 415 (1997)
  9. Cho JH, Kim YH, Lee YW, Lee WK, J. KSEE, 20, 443 (1998)
  10. Park YS, Suh JH, Song SK, J. Korean Environ. Sci. Soc., 6, 689 (1997)
  11. Pedersen K, Water Res., 24, 239 (1990) 
  12. Chung JC, J. KSEE, 16, 589 (1994)
  13. Hashiki K, Furukawa S, Proc. of the 22nd Symposium on Sewerage and Sewage Treatment, Jun., Fukuoka, 259 (1985)
  14. Dubinin MM, Carbon, 18, 355 (1980) 
  15. Park DW, Jung JY, Jung YC, Environ. Eng. Res., 1, 37 (1996)