Polymer, Vol.43, No.13, 3803-3809, 2002
Comparison of recent rubber-elasticity theories with biaxial stress-strain data: the slip-link theory of Edwards and Vilgis
The Edwards-Vilgis (EV) slip-link theory (1986) derives the elastic free energy of a rubber-like network model containing stable and sliding network junctions (crosslinks and slip-links) and predicts both low-strain softening and high-strain hardening. The four-parameter stress-strain relations calculated by the theory for geometrically different deformation modes up to high strains were tested experimentally using published biaxial stress-strain data on simple covalently crosslinked networks. For networks with low degrees of strain softening and low extensibilities, the experimental dependencies could be described rather well but, generally, a simultaneous satisfactory fit to uniaxial, pure shear and equibiaxial data was not obtained. Systematic experiment-theory deviations exceeding 10% were observed and some of the parameters had a tendency to assume values lying outside the reasonably expected range. The prediction of a pronounced maximum in the strain dependence of stress supported by slip-links seems to be a reason for the discrepancy. Also, modeling of the high-strain singularity in entropy is done in the EV theory using a rather simple approximation. As a result, the finite extensibility contribution to the stress of a sliplink-free network model becomes improbably high and significantly exceeds that following, at a given modulus and locking stretch, from the rigorously derived Langevin-statistics-based eight-chain-network elasticity theory of Arruda and Boyce.