International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, Vol.46, No.2, 333-339, 2003
Use of the microscopic parabolic heat conduction model in place of the macroscopic model validation criterion under harmonic boundary heating
Parabolic heat conduction models are considered. The validity of using a microscopic under harmonic fluctuating boundary heating source is investigated. It is found that using the microscopic parabolic heat conduction model is essential when omegaC(1)/G > 0.1. The phase-shift between the electron gas and solid lattice temperatures is found to be tan(-1) (omegaC(1)/G). This phase-shift reaches a fixed value of 1.5708 rad at very large values of omegaC(1)/G. It is found that using the microscopic parabolic heat conduction model is essential when omega > 1 x 10(9) rad/s for most metallic layers regardless of their thickness.
Keywords:microscopic heat conduction;parabolic microscopic model;two-step heat conduction model;parabolic two-step heat conduction model;microscopic and macroscopic heat conduction