Recently, early onset linear scaling computation of the exchange-correlation matrix has been achieved using hierarchical cubature [J. Chem. Phys. 113, 10037 (2000)]. Hierarchical cubature differs from other methods in that the integration grid is adaptive and purely Cartesian, which allows for a straightforward domain decomposition in parallel computations; the volume enclosing the entire grid may be simply divided into a number of nonoverlapping boxes. In our data parallel approach, each box requires only a fraction of the total density to perform the necessary numerical integrations due to the finite extent of Gaussian-orbital basis sets. This inherent data locality may be exploited to reduce communications between processors as well as to avoid memory and copy overheads associated with data replication. Although the hierarchical cubature grid is Cartesian, naive boxing leads to irregular work loads due to strong spatial variations of the grid and the electron density. In this paper we describe equal time partitioning, which employs time measurement of the smallest sub-volumes (corresponding to the primitive cubature rule) to load balance grid-work for the next self-consistent-field iteration. After start-up from a heuristic center of mass partitioning, equal time partitioning exploits smooth variation of the density and grid between iterations to achieve load balance. With the 3-21G basis set and a medium quality grid, equal time partitioning applied to taxol (62 heavy atoms) attained a speedup of 61 out of 64 processors, while for a 110 molecule water cluster at standard density it achieved a speedup of 113 out of 128. The efficiency of equal time partitioning applied to hierarchical cubature improves as the grid work per processor increases. With a fine grid and the 6-311G(df,p) basis set, calculations on the 26 atom molecule alpha-pinene achieved a parallel efficiency better than 99% with 64 processors. For more coarse grained calculations, superlinear speedups are found to result from reduced computational complexity associated with data parallelism. (C) 2003 American Institute of Physics.