화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.9, No.4, 360-365, October, 2003
Effects of Soil Buffering Capacity and Citric Acid in Electrolyte on Electrokinetic Remediation of Mine Tailing Soils
E-mail:
Electrokinetic remediation was applied to the removal of heavy metals from mine tailing soils sampled from the piles at two abandoned mines (K and O) in which major contaminants were Cu, Pb, Cd, As and Zn. Experimental results on metal removal characteristics, tendency of electroosmosis, established soil pH profile and the role of citric acid as an electrolyte component were presented and discussed concerning to the buffering capacity and zeta potential of the soils. Since both tailing soils had positive zeta potential, electroosmotic flow formed toward anode and thus about 15-34% of removed metals were found in anode chamber, implying that the mechanisms of metal removal were by electromigration mostly and by electroosmosis in minor. The use of citric acid as an electrolyte component enabled us to maintain an acidic pH for the soil with a low buffering capacity (K soil), resulting in increased electroosmotic flow rate and 35-40% higher metal removal efficiency. Without the addition of citric acid, a steep pH gradient was developed in K soil and the electroosmotic flow rate was greatly diminished. For the soil with a high buffering capacity (O soil), there were no significant differences in pH gradient, eletroosmotic flow rate and metal removal, regardless the use of citric acid. Overall 37-41% of metals were removed for 2 weeks under the 2 conditions of 0.25 mA/cm(2) of current density and using electrolytes with 2.5 mS/cm conductivity.
  1. Kim KK, Kim KW, Kim JY, Kim IS, Cheong YW, Min JS, Environ. Geol., 41, 358 (2001) 
  2. Smith LA, Remedial Options for Metals-Contaminated Sites, Chap. 4, CRC, U.S.A. (1995)
  3. Acar YB, Gale RJ, Alshawabkeh AN, Marks RE, Puppala S, Bricka M, Parker R, J. Hazard. Mater., 40, 117 (1995)
  4. Pamukcu S, Wittle JK, Environ. Prog., 11(3), 241 (1992)
  5. Shapiro AP, Probstein RF, Environ. Sci. Technol., 27, 283 (1993)
  6. Dzenitis JM, Environ. Sci. Technol., 31, 1191 (1997)
  7. Kim J, Lee K, J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A-Toxic/Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng., 34(4), 863 (1999)
  8. Probstein RF, Hicks RE, Science, 260, 498 (1993)
  9. Lee HS, Lee K, J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 11(6), 1038 (2001)
  10. Kim EH, Kwon SW, Chung DY, Yoo JH, Choi CS, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 6(1), 37 (2000)
  11. Yu LJ, Neretnieks I, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 394 (1998)
  12. Reddy KR, Parupudi US, Deulapalli SN, Xu CY, J. Hazard. Mater., 55, 135 (1997)
  13. Eykholt GR, Daniel DE, J. Geotech. Eng., 120, 797 (1994) 
  14. Hong YK, Hong WH, Han DH, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 6(6), 386 (2001)
  15. Yeung AT, Hsu C, Menon RM, J. Geotech. Eng., 122(8), 666 (1996) 
  16. Lee HS, Jahng D, Lee K, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 4(2), 151 (1999)
  17. Ministry of Environment, Korea, Standard Method of Water Quality: Water Pollution, Waste, and Soil Pollution, Revised in 2002
  18. Acar YB, Alshawabkeh AN, Gale RJ, Waste Manage., 13, 141 (1993)
  19. Perrin DD, Dempsey B, Buffers for pH and Metal Ion Control, Chapman and Hall, UK (1974)
  20. Eykholt GR, Daniel DE, J. Geotech. Eng., 120, 797 (1994) 
  21. Davis AP, J. Environ. Eng.-ASCE, 121(2), 174 (1995)
  22. Lee SH, Kim KR, Kim GN, Yoo JH, Chung H, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 4(3), 205 (1998)
  23. Peters RW, J. Hazard. Mater., 66, 151 (1999)
  24. Sag Y, Kutsal T, Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng., 12(6), 376 (2001)
  25. Bartosch C, Kiefer R, Holl W, React. Funct. Polym., 45, 197 (2000)
  26. Majid A, Argue S, Miner. Eng., 14(11), 1513 (2001)
  27. Shaw DJ, Introduction to Colloid and Surface Chemistry, 4th ed., Chap. 7, Butterworth-Heinemann, UK (1992)
  28. Kim JW, Liu F, Choi HJ, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 8(4), 399 (2002)