화학공학소재연구정보센터
Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.10, No.3, 492-498, May, 2004
Mass Transfer Effect on the Photocatalytic Activity of UV/TiO2 Packed-Bed System
E-mail:
Effects of mass transfer on photocatalytic activity were investigated using a recirculated feed solution (20 ~ 500 mL/min) in a UV/TiO2 packed-bed photoreactor. The rate of phenol disappearance was significantly increased as the recirculation rate was raised up to 300 mL/min and reached a plateau beyond 400 mL/min. We confirmed that the degradation rate was influenced by the convective mass transfer of phenol from the bulk solution to the external surface of the catalysis particles. Other factors, such as solution pH and initial concentration, exhibited clear influences on the photocatalytic activity of the UV/TiO2 packed-bed system. Assuming a constant intrinsic kinetic coefficient, the ratio of effective catalyst surface area to reactor volume, aexp (cm2/cm3), was estimated to be on the order of 10-3 by the re si stance-in-series model of rate constants. The obtained low a values indicate that only a small fraction of the surface area was effectively illuminated by the radiant source in the present reactor configuration and that improving the a value should be considered as one of the parameters for optimizing photoreactor design.
  1. Choi W, Lee J, Kim S, Hwang S, Lee MC, Lee TK, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 9(1), 96 (2003)
  2. Kim SB, Lee JY, Jang HT, Cha WS, Hong SC, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 9(4), 440 (2003)
  3. Sohn DR, Kim JH, Lee S, Lee HI, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 14(4), 391 (2003)
  4. Turchi CS, Ollis DF, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 6852 (1988)
  5. Serpone N, Borgarello E, Harris R, Cahill P, Bogarello M, Pelizzetti E, Sol. Energy Mater., 14, 121 (1986) 
  6. Matthews RW, J. Phys. Chem., 91, 3328 (1987)
  7. Kulas J, Rousar I, Krysa J, Jirkovsky J, J. Appl. Electrochem., 28(8), 843 (1998)
  8. Hill G, Chemical Engineering Kinetics and Reactor Design, Wiley, New York (1977)
  9. Matthews RW, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 6852 (1988)
  10. Matthews RW, Water Res., 25, 1169 (1991)
  11. Al-Ekabi H, deMayo P, J. Phys. Chem., 92, 5726 (1988)
  12. Hong SS, Ju CS, Lim CG, Ahn BH, Lim KT, Lee GD, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 7(2), 99 (2001)
  13. Choi W, Ko JY, Park H, Chung JS, Appl. Catal. B: Environ., 31(3), 209 (2001)
  14. Okamoto K, Yamamoto Y, Tanaka H, Itaya A, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 58, 2023 (1985)
  15. Patent WO97/3793 (PCT/NL&/00173)
  16. McCabe WL, Smith JC, Harriott P, Unit Operations of Chemical Engineering, McGraw-Hill, New York (1993)
  17. Smirniotis PG, Fotou GP, Pratsinis SE, Proceedings of the 5th World Congress of Chemical Engineering: Technologies Critical to a Changing World, Vol. IV, pp. 48-53, San Diego, California (1996)
  18. Park DW, Yoon SH, Kim GJ, Sekiguchi H, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 8(4), 393 (2002)
  19. Tsekov R, Smirniotis PG, Chem. Eng. Sci., 52(10), 1667 (1997)
  20. Davydov L, Tsekov R, Smirniotis PG, Chem. Eng. Sci., 56(16), 4837 (2001)
  21. Augugliaro V, Lopez-Munoz MJ, Pamisano L, Soria J, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 101, 7 (1993)