We have reinvestigated the behavior of a Cu(111) electrode in pure and cinchonidine containing aqueous 0.1 M HClO4 solution by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and in situ electrochemical scanning tunneling microscopy (STM). In contrast to previous publications by Wan et al. (Langmuir 2000, 19, 1958-1962 and references cited therein) on Cu(111) in pure 0.1 M HClO4 which claimed an adsorbate-free Cu(111) surface in the entire potential range, we have found a highly ordered hexagonal adsorbate structure with a (4 x 4) unit cell, which is stable in the potential range from hydrogen evolution at -350 to -150 mV (RHE). The adsorbate-free (1 x 1) Cu(111) surface is only visible in a fairly small potential range from -150 to +50 mV. A disordered surface structure is formed at more positive potentials which is interpreted by adsorption of an oxygen-containing species. Furthermore, the formation of a highly ordered cinchonidine adlayer on Cu(111) in 0.1 M HClO4 as reported by Wan et al. (J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002, 124, 14300-14301) could not be reproduced here. In fact, the similarity of all structures reported by Wan et al. for a great variety of different organic adlayers on Cu(111) in HClO4 solution including cinchonidine with the (4 x 4) superstructure found here already in pure HClO4 solution (i.e., without organic solute) casts serious doubts on the validity of those previous results by Wan et al. in general.