This paper follows the "defense" of the Good-van Oss-Chaudhury (GvOC) acid-base approach made in Part I and carries out a detailed analysis of the Zisman critical surface energy and, mainly, of the Neumann equation-of-state (EQS) theory. The analysis is made on both a "practical" and a theoretical basis, trying to highlight the acceptable fitting results of axisymmetric drop shape analysis (ADSA) methods and their independence of the assumed thermodynamic foundations of EQS. Some new and original criticisms of the EQS approach are raised and it is shown that other purely semiempirical models, represented by different fitting equations with the same number of parameters, can represent the data measured by ADSA method with the same goodness as EQS. The equation of state appears as one of many semiempirical approaches for the evaluation of surface free energy of solids. Independent of the previous analysis, the criteria used in ADSA measurements are evaluated and some comments made on them. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.