화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.16, No.3, 109-115, September, 2004
Comparison of the rheologies of laterite and goethite suspensions
E-mail:
Comparisons in shear behaviour are made between aqueous suspensions of a laterite ore and aqueous suspensions of pure goethite (α-FeOOH), following prior papers in which the rheologies of the two mineral suspensions were characterized individually. Drawing comparisons is appropriate because the ore sample was about 65% goethite and it was originally thought that the pure goethite might serve as a model of the more complex laterite. Viscosity measurements of the two suspensions show that, at the same solids fraction, the goethite suspensions were more viscous by an order of magnitude, even though the goethite particles had much smaller aspect ratios, Similarly, yield stresses for the goethite suspensions were at least an order of magnitude higher. The most significant difference was in transient behaviour. Time-dependent effects were investigated by subjecting a fluid to a step change or a ramp sequence in shear rate, and measuring the resulting shear stress over time. In most cases, transient behaviour could not be detected in the goethite suspensions, whereas stresses in the laterite suspensions relaxed over periods of order 10 seconds. The disparate results indicate that a goethite suspension is a poor model of a laterite slurry. The disparate results indicate that a goethite suspension is a poor model of a laterite slurry.
  1. Avotins PV, Ahlschlager SS, Wicker GR, The Rheology and Handling of Laterite Slurries, in Proc. International Laterite Symposium, Evans, D.J.I., R.S. Shoemaker and H. Veltman, eds., AIME, New Orleans, LA (1979)
  2. Avramidis KS, Turian RM, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 143, 54 (1991) 
  3. Bhattacharya IN, Panda D, Bandopadhyay P, Int. J. Miner. Process., 53(4), 251 (1998) 
  4. Blakey BC, The Viscous Behaviour of Aqueous Goethite Containing Suspensions, PhD Thesis, University of Toronto (2002)
  5. Blakey BC, James DF, Int. J. Miner. Process., 70, 23 (2003) 
  6. Blakey BC, James DF, Colloids Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Asp., 231, 19 (2003) 
  7. Cerpa A, Garcia-Gonzalez MT, Tartaj P, Requena J, Garcell LR, Serna CJ, Progr. Colloid. Polym. Sci., 100, 266 (1996)
  8. Chang JC, Lange FF, Pearson DS, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 77, 19 (1994) 
  9. Green MD, Boger DV, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 36(11), 4984 (1997) 
  10. KANAI H, AMARI T, Rheol. Acta, 34(3), 303 (1995) 
  11. Krause E, Blakey BC, Papangelakis VG, "Pressure Leaching of Nickeliferous Laterite Ores", in ALTA 1998:Nickel/Cobalt Pressure Leaching and Hydrometallurgy Forum, ALTA Metallurgical Services, Melbourne, Australia (1998)
  12. Lataillade JL, Pouyet J, Signoret C, C R Acad. Sci. Ser. B, 290, 219 (1980)
  13. Mezei A, Ferron CJ, Ashbury M, Practical Aspects of Rheological Studies for the Mineral and Process Slurries, in Rheology in the Mineral and Energy Industries II, Hawaii (1999)
  14. Nino MR, Wilde PJ, Clark DC, Patino JM, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 35(12), 4449 (1996) 
  15. Turian RM, Ma TW, Hsu FL, Sung DJ, Powder Technol., 93(3), 219 (1997) 
  16. Weiss J, McClements DJ, Langmuir, 16(5), 2145 (2000)