Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, Vol.12, No.1, 127-133, January, 2006
Prediction of CHF in Vertical Round Tubes with Uniform Heat Flux for Water
E-mail:
In recent years, models based on the local condition hypothesis have provided significant correlations for the prediction fo Critical Heat Flux (CHF) when using only a few local variables. In this work, a sutdy was carried out to develop a generalized CHF correlation in vertical round tubes with uniform heat flux. For this analysis, a CHF database composed of over 10000 CHF data points, which were collected from 12 different sources, was used. The actual data used in the development of this correlation, after the elimination of some questionable data, consisted of 8951 data points with the following parameter ranges: 0.101 ≤ P (pressure) ≤ 20.679 MPa, 9.92 ≤ G (mass flux) ≤ 18619.39 kg/m2s, 0.00102 ≤ D (diameter) ≤ 0.04468 m, 0.03 ≤ L (length) ≤ 4.97 m, 0.11 ≤ qc (CHF) ≤ 21.42 MW/m2, and -0.87 ≤ Xe (exit qualities) ≤ 1.58. The results of this work indicate that regardless of the various flow patterns and regimes that exist in the wide flow conditions, the rpediction of CHF can be made accurately with a few major local variables: the system pressure (P), tube diameter (D), mass flux of water (G), and true mass flux of vapor (GXt). The new correlation was compared with five well-known CHF correlations published previously. The new correlation can predict CHF within the root-mean-sequare error of 13.44% when using the heat balance method with an average error of -1.34%
- Thompson B, Macbeth RV, AEEW-R 356, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority (1964)
- Becker KM, Strand G, Osterdahl C, Royal Institute of Technology, Laboratory of Nuclear Engineering, KTH-NEL-14, Sweden (1971)
- Lee DH, Obertelli JD, AEEW-R213 (1963)
- Becker KM, Aktiebolaget Atomenergie Report AE 177, Sweden (1965)
- Kim HC, Baek WP, Chang SH, Nucl. Eng. Des., 199, 49 (2000)
- Mishima K, Ph.D. Thesis, Kyoto University, Japan (1984)
- Lowdermilk WH, Lanzo CD, Siegel BL, NACA TN 4382 (1958)
- Casterline JE, Matzner B, Topical Report No. I, TASK XVI, Columbia University, New York (1968)
- Griffel J, NYO-187-7, Columbia University, New York (1965)
- Swenson HS, Caver JR, Karkarla CR, ASME, 62-WA-297 (1963)
- Cheh HY, Fighetti CF, McAssey EV, Report No. CU-HTRF-T8 (1992)
- Bertoletti S, Gaspari GP, Lombardi C, Zavattarelli R, CISE Report R-74 (1963)
- Levy S, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 10, 951 (1976)
- Saha P, Zuber N, Proceedings of the 5th Int. Heat Transfer Conference, Tokyo, B4.7,pp.175-179 (1974)
- Dorra H, Lee SC, Bankoff SG, WSRC-TR-93-404, DOE Report (1993)
- Deng Z, Dougherty TJ, Yang BW, Proc. 8th Int. Topl. Mtg. Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics, Kyoto, Japan, Vol. 2, pp.981-989 (1997)
- Kim HG, Lee JC, Nucl. Eng. Des., 127, 300 (1997)
- Shah MM, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 8, 326 (1987)
- Katto Y, Ohno H, Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 27, 1641 (1984)
- Bowring RW, AEEW-R 789 (1972)
- Shim WJ, Lee SW, Kim O, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 9(3), 323 (2003)
- Shim WJ, Joo SK, J. Ind. Eng. Chem., 8(3), 268 (2002)