In this article, the validity and accuracy of the CS-MT model is evaluated by using it to model the micellization behavior of seven nonionic surfactants in aqueous solution. Detailed information about the changes in hydration that occur upon the self-assembly of the surfactants into micelles was obtained through molecular dynamics simulation and subsequently used to compute the hydrophobic driving force for micelle formation. This information has also been used to test, for the first time, approximations made in traditional molecular-thermodynamic modeling. In the CS-MT model, two separate free-energy contributions to the hydrophobic driving force are computed. The first contribution, g(dehydr), is the free-energy change associated with the dehydration of each surfactant group upon micelle formation. The second contribution, g(hydr), is the change in the hydration free energy of each surfactant group upon micelle formation. To enable the straightforward estimation of g(dehydr) and g(hydr) in the case of nonionic surfactants, a number of simplifying approximations were made. Although the CS-MT model can be used to predict a variety of micellar solution properties including the micelle shape, size, and composition, the critical micelle concentration (CMC) was selected for prediction and comparison with experimental CMC data because it depends exponentially on the free energy of micelle formation, and as such, it provides a stringent quantitative test with which to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the CS-MT model. Reasonable agreement between the CMCs predicted by the CS-MT model and the experimental CMCs was obtained for octyl glucoside (OG), dodecyl maltoside (DM), octyl sulfinyl ethanol (OSE), decyl methyl sulfoxide (C10SO), decyl dimethyl phosphine oxide (C10PO), and decanoyl-n-methylglucamide (MEGA-10). For five of these surfactants, the CMCs predicted using the CS-MT model were closer to the experimental CMCs than the CMCs predicted using the traditional molecular-thermodynamic (MT) model. In addition, CMCs predicted for mixtures of C10PO and C10SO using the CS-MT model were significantly closer to the experimental CMCs than those predicted using the traditional MT model. For dodecyl octa(ethylene oxide) (C12E8), the CMC predicted by the CS-MT model was not in good agreement with the experimental CMC and with the CMC predicted by the traditional MT model, because the simplifying approximations made to estimate g(dehydr) and g(hydr) in this case were not sufficiently accurate. Consequently, we recommend that these simplifying approximations only be used for nonionic surfactants possessing relatively small, non-polymeric heads. For MEGA-10, which is the most structurally complex of the seven nonionic surfactants modeled, the CMC predicted by the CS-MT model (6.55 mM) was found to be in much closer agreement with the experimental CMC (5 mM) than the CMC predicted by the traditional MT model (43.3 mM). Our results suggest that, for complex, small-head nonionic surfactants where it is difficult to accurately quantify the hydrophobic driving force for micelle formation using the traditional MT modeling approach, the CS-MT model is capable of making reasonable predictions of aqueous micellization behavior.