The points raised in the paper entitled "Comments on the paper entitled 'The formulation and modelling of the anodic dissolution of zinc through adsorbed intermediates'" have been discussed. It has been shown that, in contrast to the statements in the "Comments", most of the papers concerning the reaction schemes suggested for the interpretation of the dissolution or deposition of metals, which were considered as a support for the opinion of the Authors of the "Comments", support the views expressed in our original paper [J. Electroanal. Chem. 583 (2005) 148]. On the other hand, it has been stressed again that the criticism expressed in the original paper refers to dubious conclusions drawn on the basis of transient measurements. (c) 2006 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.