화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.25, No.1, 112-117, January, 2008
Degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol in aqueous solution by sono-Fenton method
E-mail:
This study presents the results of the Sono-Fenton process for the degradation of 2,4-dichlorophenol (DCP). The influential parameters such as H2O2, Fe2+ and pH for the Sono-Fenton process were investigated. Sono-Fenton method was found to be the best one for degradation efficiency of DCP when compared with that of the Fenton process. The optimum concentrations for the degradation of DCP using conventional Fenton’s method were found to be 20 mg/L of Fe2+ and 580 mg/L of H2O2 at pH 2.5. In the case of Sono-Fenton, the optimal concentrations were found to be 10 mg/L of Fe2+ and 400 mg/L of H2O2 at pH 2.5. Sono-Fenton method resulted in the reduction of required Fe2+ concentration (50%) and H2O2 concentration (31%). In addition, this method could be applicable even at pH 5.0 and a degradation efficiency of DCP was 77.6%. Kinetic studies for the degradation of DCP proved that the degradation of DCP tends to follow pseudo first order reaction and the rate constant was found to be 7×10-4 min-1.
  1. Ahlborg UG, Thunberg JM, C R C Critical Reviews in Toxicology, 7, 1 (1980)
  2. Lee HC, In JH, Kim JH, Hwang KY, Lee CH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 22(6), 882 (2005)
  3. Balfanz J, Rehm HJ, Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol., 35, 662 (1991)
  4. Farrell A, Quilty B, Water Res., 36, 2443 (2000)
  5. Munaf E, Zein R, Kurniadi R, Kuriadi I, Environ. Technol., 18, 355 (1997)
  6. Lin SH, Pan CL, Lee HG, J. Hazard. Mater., 65, 289 (1990)
  7. Metcalf, Eddy, Wastewater engineering: Treatment disposal and reuse, Mc Graw-hill, New York, USA (1995)
  8. Kim YO, Nam HU, Park YR, Lee JH, Park TJ, Lee TH, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(4), 801 (2004)
  9. Boncz MA, Bruning H, Rulkens WH, Water Sci. Technol., 47, 17 (2003)
  10. Contreras S, Rodriguez M, Momani AF, Sans C, Esplugas S, Water Res., 37, 3164 (2003)
  11. Kavitha V, Palanivelu K, J. Envi. Sci. and Health, A38, 1215 (2003)
  12. Lin JG, Chang C, Wu J, Water Sci. Technol., 33, 75 (1996)
  13. Ince NH, Tezcanti G, Belen RK, Appl. Catal., 29, 167 (2001)
  14. Lorimer JP, Manson TJ, Fiddy K, Ultrasonics, 29, 338 (1991)
  15. Petrier C, Jeunet A, Luche JL, Reveredy G, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 114, 3148 (1992)
  16. Weavers LK, Ling FH, Hoffmann MR, Environ. Sci. Technol., 32, 2727 (1998)
  17. Sedalk DL, Anders AW, Environ. Sci. Technol., 25, 777 (1991)
  18. Eisenhauer HR, J. WPCF, 36, 1116 (1964)
  19. Casero I, Dolores S, Soledad R, Dolores PB, Water Res., 31, 1985 (1997)
  20. Kwon BG, Lee DS, Kang N, Yoon J, Water Res., 33, 2110 (1999)
  21. Standard methods for examination of water and wastewater, APHA AWWA-WEF, American Public Health Association, Washington, D.C (1995)
  22. Jeffery GH, Bassett J, Mendham J, Denny RC, Volgel’s textbook of quantitative chemical analysis (1998)
  23. Kavitha V, Degradation of phenolic compounds in wastewater by Fenton processes, PhD. Thesis, Centre for Environmental Science, Anna University, Chennai (2003)
  24. Makino K, Magdl M, Reise P, J. Phys. Chem., 87, 1369 (1983)
  25. Minero C, Lucchiari M, Vione D, Maurino V, Environ. Sci. Technol., 39, 8936 (2005)
  26. Hoffmann MR, Hua I, Hochemer R, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 2, 163 (1996)
  27. Yasman Y, Bultov V, Gridin VV, Agur S, Galil N, Armon R, Schechter I, Ultrasonics Sonochemistry, 11, 365 (2004)
  28. Puri BR, Sharma LR, Pathania SM, Principles of physical chemistry, Vishal publishing and co., Jalandhar (2002)