화학공학소재연구정보센터
Clean Technology, Vol.14, No.2, 103-109, June, 2008
솔더페이스트로 솔더링 후 잔류 플럭스 오염물에 대한 준수계 세정제의 금속치구를 이용한 세정성능 평가방법 연구
A Study on the Evaluation Methods of Residual Flux Cleaning Ability by Alternative Semi-Aqueous Cleaners Using Metal Test Tools After Soldering with Solder Paste
E-mail:
초록
본 연구에서는 솔더페이스트(solder paste)로 솔더링후 표면에 잔류하는 플럭스(flux)의 효과적인 세정성능 평가방법 개발을 목적으로 하였다. 솔더링시 플럭스의 퍼짐오차를 줄이기 위해 본 연구에서 고안한 금속치구를 이용하여 1,1,1-TCE 및 플럭스 제거용 몇 가지 대표 준수계 대체세정제에 대하여 세정시간에 따른 플럭스 제거율을 무게측정법으로 측정, 비교하였다. 세정시간 변화에 따른 각 세정제의 세정효율을 측정한 결과 측정값들의 상대표준편차(RSD)가 약 4% 이하로 data의 신뢰성이 확인되었다. 따라서 솔더페이스트로 솔더링후 대체세정제의 잔류플럭스의 세정성능 평가시험에 본 연구에서 적용한 금속치구(metal test tool)를 이용한 평가방법이 유력한 방법으로 적용가능할 것으로 판단된다. 그리고 이 평가방법을 적용한 결과 현재 상용화 되어 있는 우수하다고 알려진 몇 가지 대표 준수계 대체세정제 중 ST100SX와 750H가 고활성 플럭스에 대한 세정력이 우수한 성능을 나타냈으나 기존의 1,1,1-TCE에 비해서는 현저히 떨어짐을 확인할 수 있었다.
In this study, in order to develop evaluation method of the cleaning efficiency of residual flux which remains on the surface after soldering with solder paste, a specially designed metal tool is used to reduce spread uncertainty of flux while soldering. Using this tool, the measurement of cleaning efficiency of flux after soldering for some typical alternative semi-aqueous cleaners and 1,1,1-TCE by weighing method was conducted. As the test result of cleaning efficiency for each cleaner at several different cleaning times, the precision of the data is confirmed to within about 4% relative standard deviation (RSD) range. So, it is considered that this would be a good evaluation method for evaluating the cleaning efficiency of the residual flux which remains after solder paste soldering in the alternative cleaning. The results of this test method shows that the cleaning efficiency of ST 100SX and Neozal 750H in the cleaning of residual flux was better than other semi-aqueous cleaners, but its cleaning efficiency was clearly inferior to 1,1,1-TCE.
  1. Korea Specialty Chemical Industry Association, "The Trands of Supply and Depend for the Ozone Depletion Substances," 2002 Technical Seminar for the Replacement of Ozone Depleting Materials, 7 (2002)
  2. Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, Chemicals & Biotechnology Industries Division, The Law Data Book for Protection of Ozone Layer, Korea Specialty Chemical Industry Association, 1996, p.107
  3. Japan Industrial Conference on Cleaning, Handbook of Commercial Cleaners, Daily News Co. of Chemical Engineering Press, Tokyo, Japan, 1999, p.262
  4. Supporting Corporation of Small & Medium Industrial Company, "Field Guidance Manual for Replacement of Freon and Ethane," Japan, 1997
  5. Kim H, Bae JH, Clean Technol., 12(1), 1 (2006)
  6. Jung YA, Hwang YH, Rowo KH, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 6(6), 1201 (1995)
  7. Kang YS, Yun YG, Lee JH, Nam KD, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 9(3), 413 (1998)
  8. Sullival D, Sahatjian KA, Oil Spill Conference, 511 (1993)
  9. Ro YC, Lee SY, Yun YK, Nam KD, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 5(5), 795 (1994)
  10. Park HS, Im WB, Ahn CI, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 6(5), 910 (1995)
  11. Shin MC, Lee HY, Bae JH, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 11(8), 825 (2000)
  12. Jung YW, Lee HY, Bae JH, Clean Technol., 13(2), 143 (2007)
  13. Jung YW, Lee HY, Lee MJ, Song AR, Bae JH, Clean Technol., 12(4), 250 (2006)
  14. Bae JH, Shin MC, Clean Technol., 5(2), 1 (1999)
  15. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, ASTM G-122, U.S.A. (1996)
  16. Lee YY, Row KH, Chem. Ind. Technol., 11(4), 258 (1993)
  17. Row KH, Choi DK, Lee YY, Anal. Sci. Technol., 6(5), 521 (1993)
  18. Lee HY, Han JW, Lee MJ, Park BD, Han SW, Lee DK, Park SW, Hwang IG, Bae JH, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 14(2), 142 (2003)
  19. Department of Defense, "Cleanliness Test Methods," MILSTD 2000A, U.S.A. (1995)
  20. Global Engineering Documents, IPC-TR-580, Colorado, U.S.A. (1989)
  21. Japan Industrial Conference on Cleaning, Research Data Book on the Cleaning Performance Evaluation Technology in the Cleaning Process, Japan (1997)
  22. Park BD, Lee MJ, Han JW, Lee JK, Lee DK, Han SW, Park SW, Lee HY, Bae JH, HWAHAK KONGHAK, 40(1), 106 (2002)
  23. Lim JC, J. Korean Ind. Eng. Chem., 6(4), 610 (1995)