Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.25, No.6, 1279-1285, November, 2008
Methane steam reforming for synthetic diesel fuel production from steam-hydrogasifier product gases
E-mail:
Steam-methane reforming (SMR) reaction was studied using a tubular reactor packed with NiO/γ-Al2O3 catalyst to obtain synthesis gases with H2/CO ratios optimal for the production of synthetic diesel fuel from steamhydrogasification of carbonaceous materials. Pure CH4 and CH4-CO2 mixtures were used as reactants in the presence of steam. SMR runs were conducted at various operation parameters. Increasing temperature from 873 to 1,023 K decreased H2/CO ratio from 20 to 12. H2/CO ratio decreased from 16 to 12 with pressure decreasing from 12.8 to 1.7
bars. H2/CO ratio also decreased from about 11 to 7 with steam/CH4 ratio of feed decreasing from 5 to 2, the lowest limit to avoid severe coking. With pure CH4 as the feed, H2/CO ratio of synthesis gas could not be lowered to the optimal range of 4-5 by adjusting the operation parameters; however, the limitation in optimizing the H2/CO ratio for synthetic diesel fuel production could be removed by introducing CO2 to CH4 feed to make CH4-CO2 mixtures. This effect can be primarily attributed to the contributions by CO2 reforming of CH4 as well as reverse water-gas shift reaction, which led to lower H2/CO ratio for the synthesis gas. A simulation technique, ASPEN Plus, was applied to verify the consistency between experimental data and simulation results. The model satisfactorily simulated changes of H2/CO ratio versus the operation parameters as well as the effect of CO2 addition to CH4 feed.
Keywords:Steam-methane Reforming;Operation Parameters;CO2 Addition to CH4 Feed;ASPEN Simulator;Optimal H2/CO Ratio
- Leiby SM, PEP Report No. 212, SRI International, Menlo park (1994)
- Xu J, Froment GF, AIChE J., 35, 88 (1989)
- Lee DK, Baek IH, Yoon WL, Chem. Eng. Sci., 59(4), 931 (2004)
- Spath PL, Dayton DC, Technical Report, NREL/TP-510-34929 (2003)
- Waszczuk P, Wieckowski A, Zelenay P, Gottesfeld S, Coutanceau C, Leger JM, Lamy C, J. Electroanal. Chem., 511(1-2), 55 (2001)
- Semin GL, Belyaev VD, Demin AK, Sobyanin VA, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 181(1), 131 (1999)
- Pena MA, Gomez JP, Fierro JL, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 144(1-2), 7 (1996)
- Lee SJ, Mukerjee S, Ticianelli EA, McBreen J, Electrochim. Acta, 44(19), 3283 (1999)
- Murthy M, Esayian M, Hobson A, MacKenzie S, Lee WK, Van Zee JW, J. Electrochem. Soc., 148(10), A1141 (2001)
- Anderson RB, The Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, Academic Press, New York (1984)
- Dry ME, in: Anderson JR, Boudart M, Catalysis Science and Technology, 1, 159 (1981)
- Terblanche K, Hydrocarbon Engineering, March/April, 2 (1997)
- Jeon SK, Hackett CE, Norbeck JM, Journal of Scientific and Industrial Research, 62, 81 (2003)
- Jeon SK, Park C, Hackett C, Norbeck E, Fuel, 86, 2817 (2007)
- Bradford MCJ, Vannice MA, Catal. Rev.-Sci. Eng., 41(1), 1 (1999)
- Effendi A, Zhang ZG, Hellgardt K, Honda K, Yoshida T, Catal. Today, 77(3), 181 (2002)
- Hufton JR, Mayorga S, Sircar S, AIChE J., 45(2), 248 (1999)
- Zhang ZL, Verykios XE, Macdonald SM, Affrossman S, J. Phys. Chem., 100(2), 744 (1996)
- Snoeck J, Froment G, Fowles M, International Journal of Chemical Reactor Engineering, 1, A7, 1 (2003)
- Gonzalez O, Lujano J, Pietri E, Goldwasser M, Catalysis Today, 107, 436 (2005)
- Twigg MV, Catalyst handbook, Wolfe, London (1989)
- Seo YS, Shirley A, Kolaczkowski ST, J. Power Sources, 108(1-2), 213 (2002)
- Hardiman KM, Ying TT, Adesina AA, Kennedy EM, Dlugogorski BZ, Chem. Eng. J., 102(2), 119 (2004)
- Rostrnp-Nielsen JR, Anderson JR, Boudart M, Catalysis Science and Technology, 5, 1 (1984)
- Alstrup I, J. Catal., 109, 241 (1988)