Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering, Vol.26, No.3, 724-730, May, 2009
Comparison of granular activated carbon bio-sorption and advanced oxidation processes in the treatment of leachate effluent
E-mail:
Landfill leachate is a toxic effluent of a decomposing landfill that is produced when rainwater percolates through the landfill leaching out contaminants and pollutants. Untreated leachate is a potential source for the contamination of soil, surface and ground water. In this study, the treatment processes such as granular activated carbon (GAC) adsorption/bio-sorption (batch), and advanced oxidation processes (AOP) viz. photocatalysis and Fenton’s process were
evaluated and compared by using synthetic landfill leachate (SLL) as a contaminant. TiO2 was used as a catalyst in photocatalysis, and Fenton’s reagent (H2O2/Fe^(+2)) was used in Fenton’s process. The degradation of SLL effluent by the three above-mentioned processes was characterized by the % TOC removal. The % TOC removed by photocatalysis, Fenton oxidation and bio-sorption (which includes adsorption and biodegradation) was 30, 60 and 85%, respectively. The bio-sorption increased with the increasing GAC dose. The optimum dose of Fenton’s reagent in advanced oxidation was 15 and 400 milli moles of Fe^(+2) and H2O2, respectively. The Fenton’s process showed faster degradation kinetics compared to biodegradation and photocatalysis.
- Environmental data compendium, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), Paris (2002)
- National greenhouse gas inventory 2002, Australian Greenhouse Office (AGO), Canberra (2004)
- Oleszkiewicz J, Exploitation of waste landfills. handbook, Lemprojekt, Krakow (1999)
- Luniewski S, Bezpieczne skladowanie odpadow, Ekonomia i Srodowisko, Bialystok (2000)
- Shim WG, Chaudhary DS, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH, Lee JW, Moon H, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 21(1), 212 (2004)
- Hoang T, Vigneswaran S, Ngo HH, Kandasamy J, Chaudhary D, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25, 3 (2008)
- Amokrane A, Comel C, Veron J, Water Res., 31, 297 (1997)
- Tatsi AA, Zouboulis AI, Matis KA, Samaras P, Chemosphere, 53, 737 (2003)
- Copa WM, Meidl JA, Pollut. Eng., 18, 32 (1986)
- Ince NH, Water Environ. Res., 70, 1161 (1998)
- Qureshi TI, Kim H, Kim Y, J. Chem. Eng., 10, 449 (2002)
- Lopes MJ, Patricio ZP, J. Hazard. Mater., B123, 181 (2005)
- Ushikoshi K, Kobayashi T, Uematsu K, Toji A, Kojima D, Matsumoto K, Desalination, 150(2), 121 (2002)
- Trebouet D, Schlumpf JP, Jaouen P, Quemeneur F, Water Res., 35, 2935 (2001)
- Rivas FJ, Beltran F, Gimeno O, Carvalho F, Environ. Sci. Eng., 38, 371 (2003)
- Zhang H, Choi HJ, Canazo P, Huang CP, J. Hazard. Mater., doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.04. 126 (2008)
- Hrapovic L, Ph.D. thesis, The University of Western Ontario, London (2001)
- Karamanev DG, Nikolov LN, Mamatarkova V, Minerals Engineering, 15, 341 (2002)
- Thiruvenkatachari R, Vigneswaran S, Moon IS, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 25(1), 64 (2008)
- Al-Rasheed R, Cardin DJ, Appl. Catal. A: Gen., 246(1), 39 (2003)
- Wang S, Dyes and Pigments, 20, 1 (2007)
- Rivas FJ, Beltran FJ, Gimeno O, Frades J, Carvalho F, J. Hazard. Mater., B131, 170 (2006)
- Imaii A, Onuma K, Inamori Y, Sudo R, Water Res., 29, 687 (1995)
- Galvez A, Zamorano M, Hontoria E, Ramos A, J. Environ. Sci. Heal. A, 41, 1129 (2006)
- Loukidou MX, Zouboulis AI, Environ. Pollut., 111, 273 (2001)
- Velasquez MT, Monje-Ramirez I, Sci. & Eng., 28, 309 (2006)
- Galvez A, Zamoranol M, Ramos A, Hontoria E, Environ. Sci. Heal. A, 40, 1741 (2005)
- Josmaria M, Patricio ZP, J. Hazard. Mater., B123, 181 (2005)
- Hui Z, Daobin Z, Jiayong B, J. Hazard. Mater., 106, 111 (2006)
- Huan-Jung F, Ien-Whei C, Ming-Hsien L, Tzuchen C, Chemosphere, 67, 1647 (2007)
- Ahn WY, Kang MS, Yim SK, Choi KH, Desalination, 149(1-3), 109 (2002)
- Tabet K, Moulin P, Vilomet JD, Amberto A, Charbit F, Sep. Sci. Technol., 37(5), 1041 (2002)
- Wahab A, Nidal MH, Lim YP, Int. J. Green Energy, 1, 251 (2004)
- Claudio DI, Roberto R, Antonio L, Biochem. Eng. J., 31, 118 (2006)