화학공학소재연구정보센터
Polymer(Korea), Vol.21, No.4, 563-574, July, 1997
Specific Interaction이 있는 Rigid-rod/Coil/Slovent 삼성분계의 상거동
Critical Phase Behavior of Ternary System with Specific Interaction
초록
본 연구에서는 coil 성분으로서 nylon, NaAMPS (poly(sodium 2-acrylamido-2-methylpropane sulfonate)), HAMPS (2-acrylamido-2 methylpropane sulfonate acid)
This paper reported the phase diagrams of PBZT (poly-1,4-phenylene benzobisthiazole)/nylon/MSA, PBZT/poly(sodium 2-acrylamido-2 methylpropane sulfonate) NaAMPS)/MSA, PBZT/2-acrylamido-2 methylpropane sulfonic acid (HAMPS)/MAS, and PBZT/poly (p-phenyleneterephthalamido) propanesulfonate)( PPTA-PS)/MSA. The ternary phase diagram of rigid rod polymer PBZT and amorphous nylon in methanesulfonic acid (MSA) solvent was found to follow Flory's prediction of a rod/coil/solvent ternary system very well. When sulfonated polymers, such as NaAMPS polymer and PPTA-PS, were used instead of nylon in a ternary solution, it was found that the phase behavior deviated from Flory's theory due to the possible coil/rod intermolecular interaction in the ternary solution. It was found that for the PBZT/nylon/MSA system, the X3 value was consistent with the contour length of the coil molecules as predicted by Flory's theory. However, both PBZT/HAMPS-monomer/MSA and PBZT/NaAMPS polymer/MSA systems showed an X3 value of unity. The ternary phase diagram of PPTA-PS system shows an X3 value larger than 1, which indicates the ionic interaction is not perfect like PBZT/NaAPMS polymer/MSA and PBZT/HAMPS monomer/MSA system. This suggests that the degree of intermolecular interaction between rod and coil plays an important role in determining the phase behavior of rod/coil/solvent ternary system.
  1. Hwang WF, Wiff DR, Benner CL, Helminiak TE, J. Macromol. Sci.-Phys., B22, 231 (1983)
  2. Chuah HH, Kyu T, Helminiak TE, Polymer, 28, 2129 (1987)
  3. Tracy MA, Pecora R, Macromolecules, 24(9), 237 (1992)
  4. Krause SJ, Haddock T, Price G, Lenhert PG, O'Brien JF, Helminiak TE, Adams WW, J. Polym. Sci. B: Polym. Phys., 24, 1991 (1986) 
  5. Yoshimura N, Fujimoyo K, Rubber Chem. Technol., 42, 1009 (1969)
  6. Djordjevic MB, Porter RS, Polym. Eng. Sci., 23, 650 (1983) 
  7. Nagasawain M, "Charged and Reactive Polymers," E. Selegny Ed., Vol. 1, p. 57, D. Reidel Publishing Co., Boston (1974)
  8. Conio G, Marsano E, Bonfiglioli F, Tealdi A, Russo S, Macromolecules, 24(25), 6578 (1991) 
  9. Barry C, Michael M, Macromolecules, 24(24), 3929 (1991) 
  10. Ohno N, Kumanotani J, Polym. J., 11, 947 (1979) 
  11. Tan LS, Arnold FE, Chuah H, Technical Report, WRDC-TR-90-4175 (1990)
  12. Helminiak T, Husman G, Adams W, Wiff D, Benner C, ACS Polym. Prepr., 16(2), 659 (1975)
  13. Gabriel C, University of Massachusetts, Technical Report of Contract No. 33615-83-K-5001 (1984)
  14. Chuah H, Lee CYC, Helminiak TE, Technical Report, AFWAL-TR-87-4127 (1988)
  15. Flory PJ, Macromolecules, 11(6), 1138 (1978) 
  16. Helminiak TE, Wellman M, Hwang WF, Wiff D, Rodgers V, Benner C, AFWAL-TR-80-4163 (1980)
  17. Gabriel CA, Ph.D. Thesis of University of Massachusetts at Amherat (1987)
  18. Welsh WJ, Bhaumik D, Mark JE, Macromolecules, 14, 947 (1981) 
  19. Gieselman MB, Reynolds J, Technical Report, WRDC-TR-90-4035 (1990)
  20. Silverstein RM, "Spectrometric Identification of Organic Compound," John Wiley & Sons (1976)
  21. Lee CYC, Huh W, Bai SJ, Technical Report, WRDC-TR-90-4017 (1990)
  22. Tsai SW, Halpin JC, Pagano NJ, Composite Material Workshop. Technomic Publishing Company (1969)