화학공학소재연구정보센터
홈 로그인 로그아웃 연락처 사이트맵
Clean Technology, Vol.15, No.2, 137-145, June, 2009
Export Citation
청정생산프로그램 ECOPROFIT의 국내 도입 성과분석
A Performance Analysis of the Cleaner Production Program ECOPROFIT for Korean Regional Industry
주흥신†, 조병옥, 박중구
  • 국립서울산업대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과, 139-743 서울특별시 노원구 공릉2동 172
Hong-Shin Ju†, Byung-Oke Cho, and Jung-Gu Park
  • Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Seoul National University of Technology, 172 Gongneung-2-dong, Nowon-gu, Seoul 139-743, Korea
E-mail:
초록
본 연구에서는 국내 15개 중소기엽을 대상으로 오스트리아의 청정생산프로그램 ECOPROFIT 을 시범 도입한 후 그 적용에 따른 성과 및 도출된 개선방안을 오스트리아의 사례와 비교·분석하였다 국내 기엽에서 도출된 다양한 개선방안들은 적정 내부관리, 프로세스 변화, 내·외부 재활용, 원료물질 대체 등의 순으로 나타났다. 두 나라의 사례에서 도출된 개선방안 건수가 기업규모별 분포나 업종에서는 상관관계를 보이지 않은 점과 적정 내부관리가 주요 개선방얀이라는 공통점이 있었다. 반면에 투자대비 회수기간이 국내가 1.9년인데 비해 오스트리아는 0.5년으로 차이를 보였으며, 도출된 개선방안의 주된 미적용 사유에서도 국내의 경우 사업의 후순위, 오스트리아의 경우 기술적 문제 등으로 차이가 있었다. 국내 중소기업의 청정생산을 활성화하기 위해서는 보다 많은 기업의 적용 사례와 성과를 체계적으로 분석하고 지속적인 정보 공유 및 성과 확산을 위한 추가적인 연구가 진행되어야 할 것이다.
In this study, Austrian cleaner production program, ECOPROFIT, was introduced to 15 companies in Korea. The performance and the proposed options of the program were compared with those of Austria. Various options such as good housekeeping, process changes, internal/external recycling, substitution of raw materials were suggested for domestic companies. There are something in common between Korea and Austria such as no relation between company sizes and derived options and good housekeeping as a major option. The difference is that 1.9 years of recovery period on investment is required in Korea, while only 0.5 year is required in Austria. The reason for not applying the suggestions was due to the priority of the company policies in Korea, but was due to the technical problems in Austria. To activate the cleaner production in the Korean regional industry, more systematic analysis on the examples and performances as well as additional studies to disseminate informations and the best practices are necessary.
Keywords:Cleaner production;ECOPROFIT;Economic performance
  1. Kim YG, Nam YM, Case Study of Cleaner Production lntegration National Institute of Environmental Research, Korea (1998)
  2. Korea National Cleaner Production Center, A Comparison Study of National Cleaner Production Programs in Korea and Foreign Countries, KlTECH, Korea (2006)
  3. Fresner J, J. Clean. Prod., 6, 237 (1998)
  4. Fresner J, J. Clean. Prod., 2, 43 (1994)
  5. Gardstrom T, Norrthon P, J. Clean. Prod., 2, 201 (1994)
  6. http://www.cpc.at/oeko/oe_Waslst_e.htm
  7. http://www.kncpc.re.kr/programns/programs_green_business.asp
  8. Daeil Business Appraisal, Evaluation of Performance of National Cleaner Production Technology Development Program and Analysis of Commercialization Status, KNCPC, Korea (2005)
  9. Ministry of Commerce, Industry and Energy, Vision and Advanced Strategy for Building Environmental-friendly Industrial Structure, Korea (2003)
  10. Presidential Advisory Council on Science and Technology, Improvement of Environmental-friendly Industrial Structure and Advanced Planning, Korea (2006)
  11. Engelhardt G, Ecoprofit Basic Booklet Series: Methodology, Contents and Systematics, Environment Department, City of Graz, Austria (2003)
  12. Fresner J, Kellerman J, Sebesta B, Schnitzer H, Ecoprofit-Styria-Prepare, 2nd European Roundtable on Cleaner Production Program, Rotterdam, The Netherlands (1995)