The involvement of membrane-bound peptides and the influence of protein conformations in several neurodegenerative diseases lead us to analyze the interactions of model peptides with artificial membranes. Two model peptides were selected. The first one, an alanine-rich peptide, K(3)A(18)K(3), was shown to be in alpha-helix structures in TFE, a membrane environment-mimicking solvent, while it was mostly beta-sheeted in aqueous buffer as revealed by infrared spectroscopy. The other, alamethicin, a natural peptide, was in a stable (x-helix structure. To determine the role of the peptide conformation on the nature of its interactions with lipids, we compared the structure and topology of the conformational-labile peptide K3A18K3 and of the (X-helix rigid alamethicin in both aqueous and phospholipid environments (Langmuir rnonolayers and multilamellar vesicles). K(3)A(18)K(3) at the air-water interface showed a pressure-dependent orientation of its beta-sheets, while the (x-helix axis of alamethicin was always parallel to the interface, as probed by polarization modulation infrared reflection absorption spectroscopy. The beta-sheeted K(3)A(18)K(3) peptide was uniformly distributed into DPPC condensed domains, while the helical-alamethicin insertion distorted the DPPC condensed domains, as evidenced by Brewster angle microscopy imaging of the air/interface. The beta-sheeted K(3)A(18)K(3) interacted with DMPC multilamellar vesicles via hydrophilic interactions with polar heads and the helical-alamethicin via hydrophobic interactions with alkyl chains, as shown by infrared spectroscopy and solid state NMR. Our findings are consistent with the prevailing assumption that the conformation of the peptide predetermines the mode of interaction with lipids. More precisely, helical peptides tend to be inserted via hydrophobic interactions within the hydrophobic region of membranes, while beta-sheeted peptides are predisposed to interact with polar groups and stay at the surface of lipid layers.