화학공학소재연구정보센터
Korea-Australia Rheology Journal, Vol.22, No.3, 163-168, September, 2010
Are tube viscometer data valid for suspension flows?
E-mail:
Successful rheological characterization of mineral slurries is fraught with many problems and the need to pump higher concentrations, especially in tailings disposal, has meant that more and more slurries exhibit non-Newtonian behaviour. Capillary tube viscometry is the preferred method of testing and apparently credible results obtained from stable “homogeneous” suspensions, containing particles with diameters of 10 s and 100 s of microns, are the rule rather than the exception. Settleable solids suspended in visco-plastic fluids may be stable in the un-sheared condition, but will stratify when the fluid is sheared. This behaviour results in an unobserved stratified flow within the conveying line. For small pipes, such as those used for rheological characterization, the stratified bed flow effect is small and is masked by the viscous nature of the suspending medium. Unfortunately, the stratified bed flow dominates the transport pressure gradients in larger pipes, resulting in often gross under-prediction of full size behaviour. To illustrate this effect, tests conducted with a non-Newtonian carrier fluid in 12 and 25NB (nominal bore) pipes were found to be insensitive to the addition of large (-1 mm) particles at concentrations up to 20% w/w. Conversely, transport characteristics for these suspensions are a strong function of solids concentration in larger pipes, e.g 100NB. Analysis presented in the paper shows that such behaviour is consistent with the behaviour of high viscosity stratified flows. In practice, tests would not be attempted with such large particles, which make the results obtained even more surprising. The behaviour casts doubts upon the validity of much of the capillary tube data obtained with “normal” slurry size distributions. This phenomenon needs to be understood, if the design of high concentration pumping systems for industrial slurries and pastes is to be performed with any certainty.
  1. Bhattacharya SN, Pullum L, Transport of Coarse Particles in a Fine Suspension Medium. Indian Chemical Engineering Congress, Anna University, Madras, India. (1991)
  2. Gillies RG, Shook CA, Wilson KC, J. Chem. Eng., 69, 173 (1991)
  3. Hanks RR, Hanks KW, A new viscometer for determining the effect of particle size distributions and concentration on slurry rheology, 7th Int. Tech. Conf. on slurry transportation, Lake Tahoe, NV, USA, pp. 151-161. (1982)
  4. Metzner AB, Reed JC, AIChE Journal, 1, 434 (1955)
  5. Newitt DM, Richardson JF, Abbot M, Turtle RB, Trans. Inst of Chem. Engrs., 33, 93 (1955)
  6. Pullum L, Graham LKW, The use of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to probe complex hybrid suspension flows. 10th International Conference on Transport and Sedimentation of Solid Particles, Wroclaw, Poland., pp. 421-433. (2000)
  7. Pullum L, Graham LJW, Slatter PT, A non-Newtonian two layer model and its application to high density hydrotransport. 16th International Conference on Hydrotranscbport, Santiago, BHR group., pp. 597-594. (2004)
  8. Pullum L, Graham L, Rudman M, Hamilton R, Minerals Engineering, 19, 471 (2006)
  9. Pullum L, Slatter P, Vietti A, Transport characteristics of a stabilized co-disposal tailing line. 12th Transport and Sedimentation of solid particles, Prague, Czech Republic., pp. 557-564.
  10. Slatter PT, Petersen FW, Moodie L, J S Afr. Inst. Min. Metall, 98, 165 (1998)
  11. Stickel JJ, Powell RL, Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 39, 129 (2005)
  12. Turian RM, Ma TW, Hsu FL, Sung DJ, Powder Technol., 93(3), 219 (1997)
  13. Wilson KC, A unified physically-based analysis of solidliquid pipeline flow. hydrotransport 4, Cranfield, England, BHRA., pp. A1-16.