청정생산R&D 정부출연금의 기업R&D투자에 대한 효과분석 - 민간기업R&D투자의 보완 . 대체효과를 중심으로 -

주홍신; 김점수; 박중구; Hong-Shin Ju; Jum-Su Kim; Jung-Gu Park

Clean Technology, Vol.17, No.2, 181-188, June, 2011

Analysis of the Effects of Public R&D Subsidy on Private R&D Investment in the Cleaner Production - Complementary or Crowding-out Effect -

주홍신^†, 김점수, 박중구

서울과학기술대학교 에너지환경대학원 에너지정책학과, 139-743 서울특별시 노원구 공릉2동 172

Hong-Shin Ju^†, Jum-Su Kim, and Jung-Gu Park

Department of Energy Policy, Graduate School of Energy and Environment, Seoul National University of Science and Technology, 172 Gongneung2-dong, Nowon-Gu, Seoul, 139-743, Korea

E-mail:

초록

본 논문은 청정생산분야의 정부R&D투자에 대한 기업R&D투자의 대응방식(보완 또는 대체효과)을 조사하고, 기업R&D투자의 보완.대체의 효과성에 영향을 주는 주요 결정요인과의 상관관계를 분석하였다. 정부R&D지원을 받은 조사대상 207 개중에서 95개(45.9%)는 기업R&D투자가 증가하였고, 38개(18.4%)에서는 감소한 것으로 나타났다. 로지스틱 회귀분석 (logistic regression analysis)을 통한 상관관계의 분석 결과, 해당기업의 R&D투자집약도가 클수록 정부R&D투자가 기업 R&D투자를 보완하는 효과를 나타내고 있는 것으로 분석되었다. 반면 기업규모, 정부지원 비중, R&D인력집약도 등에서는 기업R&D투자의 보완.대체효과에 대해서 유의미한 결과가 나타나지 않았다. 이에 따라 정부의 청정생산R&D 지원효과를 높이기 위해서는 매출액 대비 R&D투자를 많이 하고 있는 기업에 보다 중점적으로 지원하는 것이 필요하다. 아울러 정부 R&D사업의 선정과 지원을 보다 효과적으로 하기 위해서는 그간 추진되어왔던 R&D사업별로 사업특성에 따라 보다 미시적인 분석이 필요할 것이다.

In this study, the complementary or crowding-out effects of public R&D subsidy on private R&D investment in the cleaner production were analysed between the effects and the major determinants (company size, R&D investment intensity, ratio of government investment, R&D manpower intensity). Among 207 firms' projects, the number of the complementary effect was 95 (45.9%) while that of crowding-out effect was 38 (18.4%). Resulting from logistic regression, the higher the R&D investment of sponsored companies is, the more complementary effect they show, responding to public R&D subsidy, and increase own R&D investment. The other determinants, however, showed no significant effects on firms' R&D investment. To heighten the effect of public cleaner production R&D, it is need to increase the priority of R&D investment intensity among the determinants. And to increase the performance of governmental R&D investment, further studies for the individual public R&D programs are necessary.

Keywords:Governmental R&D subsidy;Private R&D investment;Cleaner production R&D;Complementary or crowding-out effects

[References]

Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Survey of Research and Development in Korea (2010)
http://www.mest.go.kr/web/1074/site/contents/ko/ko_0050.jsp
Guellec D, Van Pottelsberghe B, “The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2000/4, OECD (2000)
David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA, Res. Policy., 29, 497 (2000)
Emre O, Taymaz E, Res. Policy., 37(2), 258 (2008)
Blank DM, Stigler GJ, “The Demand and Supply of Scientific Personnel,” National Bureau of Economic Research, New York (1957)
Shin T, “Behavioral and Dynamic Relationships between Government R&D and Private R&D Expenditures: Complementarity vs. Substitutability,” STEPI (2004)
Lee B, “Government and Private Business Research and Development: Are they Complements or Substitutes?,” KERI (2004)
Kwon NH, Int. Econ. J., 10(2), 157 (2004)
Kim HS, “Effectiveness of Tax Policy Towards R&D,”KERI (2007)
Ko SW, Kwon NH, Lee KN, “Effect of government subsidy on private IT R&D investment,” KISDI (2005)
Kim I, Kim WK, Kim HS, “An Analysis on Efficiency of R&D Investment,” KIET (2003)
Yoo MH, Park JG, Rev. Bus.Econ., 19(6), 2445 (2006)
http://www.kncpc.re.kr/programs/programs_green_purpose.asp
http://pms.kncpc.re.kr

[1] Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, Survey of Research and Development in Korea (2010)

[2] http://www.mest.go.kr/web/1074/site/contents/ko/ko_0050.jsp

[3] Guellec D, Van Pottelsberghe B, “The Impact of Public R&D Expenditure on Business R&D,” OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2000/4, OECD (2000)

[4] David PA, Hall BH, Toole AA, Res. Policy., 29, 497 (2000)

[5] Emre O, Taymaz E, Res. Policy., 37(2), 258 (2008)

[6] Blank DM, Stigler GJ, “The Demand and Supply of Scientific Personnel,” National Bureau of Economic Research, New York (1957)

[7] Shin T, “Behavioral and Dynamic Relationships between Government R&D and Private R&D Expenditures: Complementarity vs. Substitutability,” STEPI (2004)

[8] Lee B, “Government and Private Business Research and Development: Are they Complements or Substitutes?,” KERI (2004)

[9] Kwon NH, Int. Econ. J., 10(2), 157 (2004)

[10] Kim HS, “Effectiveness of Tax Policy Towards R&D,”KERI (2007)

[11] Ko SW, Kwon NH, Lee KN, “Effect of government subsidy on private IT R&D investment,” KISDI (2005)

[12] Kim I, Kim WK, Kim HS, “An Analysis on Efficiency of R&D Investment,” KIET (2003)

[13] Yoo MH, Park JG, Rev. Bus.Econ., 19(6), 2445 (2006)

[14] http://www.kncpc.re.kr/programs/programs_green_purpose.asp

[15] http://pms.kncpc.re.kr