화학공학소재연구정보센터
Polymer, Vol.51, No.21, 4937-4947, 2010
Stereocomplex crystallization and spherulite growth behavior of poly(L-lactide)-b-poly(D-lactide) stereodiblock copolymers
The non-isothermally and isothermally crystallized stereodiblock copolymers of poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) and poly(D-lactide) (PDLA) with equimolar L-lactyl and D-lactyl units and different number-average molecular weights (M-n) of 3.9 x 10(3), 9.3 x 10(3), and 1.1 x 10(4) g mol(-1), which are abbreviated as PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers, contained only stereocomplex crystallites as crystalline species, causing higher melting temperatures of the PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers compared to those of PLEA homopolymers. In the case of non-isothermal crystallization, the cold crystallization temperatures of the PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers during heating and cooling were respectively lower and higher than those of PLLA homopolymers, indicating accelerated crystallization of PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers. In the case of isothermal crystallization, in the crystallizable temperature range, the crystallinity (X-c) values of the PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers were lower than those of the PLEA homopolymers, and were susceptible to the effect of crystallization temperature in contrast to that of homopolymers. The radial growth rate of the spherulites (G) of the PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers was the highest at the middle M-n of 9.3 x 10(3) g mol(-1). This trend is different from that of the PLLA homopolymers where the G values increased monotonically with a decrease in M-n, but seems to be caused by the upper critical M-n, values of PLLA and PDLA chains as in the case of PLLA/PDLA blends (in other papers), above which homo-crystallites are formed in addition to stereocomplex crystallites. The disturbed crystallization of PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers compared to that of the PLLA/PDLA blend is attributable to the segmental connection between the PLLA and PDLA chains, which interrupted the free movement of those chains of the PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers during crystallization. The crystallite growth mechanism of the PLLA-b-PDLA copolymers was different from that of the PLLA/PDLA blend. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.